Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Ease the back pressure on the yoke after rotation so the pitch change is smoother and g force stays lower.
What happened: During the initial climb the average g force reached 1.3 g, a high value for that phase.
Watch for: G meter: smooth, steady value in the normal climb band
Arrival
Shallow the descent on final to re-intercept the glideslope and cross the threshold at 50 ft.
What happened: The aircraft was off the glideslope during the approach, tracking low against the required path.
Watch for: Watch the glideslope indicator and threshold height, targeting 50 ft at the threshold.
See Arrival Approach
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: glideslope 4.0° against the runway's 3° and centreline 4.4° off, against a 1° limit.
At the 500 ft gate: sink rate 1,326 fpm, more than the glideslope needed, glideslope 4.1° against the runway's 3° and centreline 1.9° off, against a 1° limit.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,255 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,255 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 311 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Lennart Meri Tallinn Airport, the Boeing 737-600 initiated its takeoff roll on runway 08, accelerating to a liftoff speed of 142 kt after covering a distance of 700 meters, which accounted for 22% of the runway's length. The aircraft then transitioned into a steady climb, ascending from 1,105 feet above sea level to 39,994 feet in 30 minutes, covering a distance of 222 nautical miles. This phase of the flight was characterized by a steady increase in altitude, with the aircraft reaching a maximum altitude of 39,994 feet.
Following the initial climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, maintaining an altitude of 39,994 feet for 111 minutes while covering a distance of 856 nautical miles. This phase of the flight was marked by a relatively stable airspeed and altitude, allowing the aircraft to conserve fuel and maintain a steady pace. The aircraft then began its descent, gradually losing altitude from 39,679 feet to 22,537 feet in 12 minutes, covering a distance of 94 nautical miles. This descent phase was followed by a brief level cruise phase, lasting only 2 minutes, before the aircraft initiated its final descent, losing altitude from 22,293 feet to 2,073 feet in 12 minutes, covering a distance of 58 nautical miles.
The Boeing 737-600 then entered its final approach phase, aligning itself with runway 35 at Cannes-Mandelieu Airport from the south. The aircraft touched down on the runway at a speed of 111 kt, slightly above the target speed, and covered a touchdown distance of 312 meters. The aircraft's touchdown rate was fair at -217 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was very good. Following a smooth rollout, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile in 1 minute. The total flight distance was 1,246 nautical miles, and the aircraft used 7,109 kilograms of fuel during the flight, which lasted a total of 173 minutes.
The Boeing 737-600 touched down on runway 35 at LFMD Cannes-Mandelieu Airport with a satisfactory approach quality, demonstrating good control and precision throughout the descent. The aircraft was established on the final approach from the south, heading 348.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,684 feet above ground level. The threshold height was good, allowing for a smooth transition to the landing phase.
As the aircraft touched down, the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 118 knots, which may have contributed to a touchdown speed of 111 knots, a little faster than desired. However, the touchdown distance of 312 meters was good, and the runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating excellent control and precision during the landing phase. The touchdown rate of -217 feet per minute was fair, suggesting a slight loss of altitude during the touchdown.
The aircraft's rollout was characterized by perfect alignment with the runway centerline, demonstrating excellent control and precision during the post-landing phase. The total landing distance of 721 meters, which accounted for 63% of the runway length, was within acceptable limits. Overall, the landing performance was satisfactory, with a score of 99.2%. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 17°C and a light wind of 6 knots at 250°, contributed to a relatively straightforward landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values