Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 29 stages, 27 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,805 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,805 m of the 3,665 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 660 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, with an aircraft landing score of 86.3%, there are certainly some areas for improvement in the landing process. It's important to focus on the positive aspects - the Approach Phase had excellent glideslope alignment, indicating a good sense of vertical positioning. The Landing Phase also had a good threshold height, showing precision in the descent.
However, there were some areas that require attention. The Landing Phase had a very poor landing flare, which likely contributed to the hard touchdown rate. While the touchdown speed was on target, the touchdown point being 242m beyond the designated zone is a significant distance and shows a need for better judgment in the landing process.
Furthermore, the runway touchdown position was off center, with a deviation of 4.1m from the designated centerline. This indicates a need for improved lateral alignment during the landing phase. The Rollout Phase also had some issues, with a runway alignment deviation of 17.0m from the centerline, highlighting the need for better tracking during the rollout.
Overall, while there were some strong points in the landing process, there are definitely areas that need improvement in terms of flare, touchdown precision, and runway alignment. By focusing on these areas and implementing corrective measures, the overall landing score can be improved and a smoother, more precise landing can be achieved. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in all phases of the landing process. You have the potential to achieve even higher scores with dedication and practice.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values