Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,923 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 514 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
First and foremost, congratulations on achieving an aircraft landing score of 85.7%! This is a solid result and showcases your skill as a pilot.
As we dive into the detailed analysis of your landing, it's important to recognize the areas where improvements can be made.
In the Approach Phase, it's noted that the descent path was above the glideslope limit and the speed was slightly below target. This indicates the need for better vertical and horizontal alignment during the approach.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it's highlighted that the threshold height was above target and the landing flare was very poor. Ensuring proper height and angle at touchdown is crucial for a smooth landing and should be a focus area for improvement.
However, it's worth noting that the Touchdown Phase had some positive aspects with a smooth touchdown rate and on-target speed. The touchdown point being slightly beyond the designated zone may be something to work on for precision landings.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was praised as very good. This indicates a strong ability to maintain control and direction during the rollout process.
Overall, with a few adjustments to the approach, landing technique, and touchdown point precision, your aircraft landing score has the potential to improve even further. Keep up the great work and continue to strive for excellence in all phases of the landing process. Your dedication and attention to detail will surely lead to even greater success in the future. Well done!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values