Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Ease the back pressure on the yoke after rotation so the pitch change is smoother and g force stays lower.
What happened: During the initial climb the average g force reached 1.5 g, a high value for that phase.
Watch for: G meter: smooth, steady value in the normal climb band
Arrival
Track the centreline through touchdown using small rudder corrections against a point at the far end of the runway.
What happened: The aircraft touched down off the centreline at 286 m, and drifting off centreline at touchdown usually carries through into the rollout, as it did here with alignment reaching 272 m.
Watch for: Watch runway centreline position, keeping deviation inside the limit through touchdown and rollout.
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: centreline 5.8° off, against a 1° limit.
At the 500 ft gate: centreline 9.1° off, against a 1° limit.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,557 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 536 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Heydar Aliyev International Airport (UBBB) in Baku, Azerbaijan, the Phenom 300E aircraft began its journey with a taxiing phase that lasted 19 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. Upon reaching the runway, the aircraft initiated its departure roll on runway 35, utilizing 23% of the 760-meter runway to achieve liftoff at a speed of 127 knots. The local weather conditions at the time of departure featured a temperature of 16°C, with a gentle headwind of 9 knots from a northerly direction.
As the aircraft climbed away from Baku, it transitioned into an enroute climb phase, ascending from 950 feet above sea level to 36,004 feet in just 9 minutes, covering a distance of 36 nautical miles. This rapid ascent was followed by a level cruise phase, which lasted 14 minutes and spanned 97 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, gradually losing altitude from 36,001 feet to 2,830 feet in 22 minutes, while covering a distance of 111 nautical miles. The descent phase concluded as the aircraft approached Tbilisi International Airport (UGTB), where it initiated its final approach to runway 31L from the southeast.
The Phenom 300E touched down on runway 31L with a speed of 94 knots, achieving an excellent touchdown rate of -67 feet per minute. The aircraft's touchdown point was 187 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and its runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.9 meters from the centerline. The total landing distance covered 45% of the 2,998-meter runway, and the runway rollout alignment was very good. Following a brief taxiing phase, the aircraft arrived at the parking area, having completed a total flight distance of 251 nautical miles and utilizing 422 kilograms of fuel in the process, which took a total of 51 minutes.
The aircraft touched down on runway 31L at UGTB Tbilisi International Airport, with a threshold height of 59 ft agl, slightly above the target. The threshold speed was well-managed at 111 kt, indicating a smooth and controlled approach. As the aircraft made contact with the runway, it touched down at a speed of 94 kt, which was within the acceptable range.
The touchdown characteristics were excellent, with a touchdown rate of -67 fpm, demonstrating a high degree of control and precision. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.9 m from the centreline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the approach path. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 15 °C and a headwind of 7 kt, were favorable for the landing.
The total landing distance of 1,351 m was 45% of the runway length, which is within the acceptable range. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating a high degree of control and precision during the rollout phase. Overall, the landing was scored 91.4%, reflecting a high level of proficiency and control throughout the approach, touchdown, and rollout phases.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values