Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Configure earlier
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: off the centreline and speed above the reference speed.
At the 500 ft gate: wings not level and speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,380 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 156 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking area to the runway, which took approximately 6 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a B350, then departed from runway 27L at the Miami Executive Airport (KTMB). The takeoff distance was 500 meters, which is 27% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 99 knots.
As the aircraft climbed out of the airport, it encountered local weather conditions with a temperature of 30 degrees Celsius. The enroute climb started overhead the Miami Executive Airport, where the aircraft ascended from 1,053 feet above sea level to 7,070 feet above sea level, an increase of 6,017 feet in 6 minutes, covering a distance of 8 nautical miles.
The enroute descent began overhead Tamiami, where the aircraft descended from 7,075 feet above sea level to 926 feet above sea level, a decrease of 6,148 feet in 5 minutes, covering a distance of 11 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise started overhead Opa-locka and lasted for 7 minutes, covering a distance of 11 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 10L at the Fort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport (KFLL) was made from the west, with a heading of 83.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,153 feet above ground level. The landing on runway 10L, which has a length of 2,380 meters, was successful, with a threshold height of good, a threshold speed of 108 knots, and a touchdown speed of 101 knots.
The touchdown distance was good at 153 meters, and the touchdown rate was firm at -302 feet per minute. However, the runway touchdown position was significantly misaligned by 20.1 meters from the centreline. The total landing distance was 345 meters, which is 14% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was also misaligned by 19.9 meters from the centreline.
After landing, the aircraft taxiied to the parking area, which took approximately 1 minute and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 35 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 24 minutes. The aircraft used 93 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The aircraft, identified as a B350, successfully landed on runway 10L at KFLL Fort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport. The final approach was initiated from the west, heading 83.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,153 feet above ground level. The aircraft scored an overall performance of 85.8%.
Upon landing, the aircraft demonstrated good control, touching down at a speed of 101 knots and a distance of 153 meters. The touchdown rate was firm at -302 feet per minute, indicating a controlled descent. However, the runway touchdown position was significantly misaligned by 20.1 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to factors such as wind or pilot error.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 30°C, which may have affected the aircraft's performance. The total landing distance of 345 meters was relatively short, accounting for only 14% of the runway length. This suggests that the aircraft was able to maintain a high level of control and stability throughout the landing process.
Despite the good overall performance, the runway rollout alignment was also misaligned by 19.9 meters from the centerline. This may indicate that the pilot was still adjusting to the aircraft's position on the runway after touchdown, or that there were issues with the aircraft's braking system.
Overall, the landing was considered successful, but there were some areas for improvement, particularly in terms of alignment and control during the rollout phase.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values