Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 24 stages, 22 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,195 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 554 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The 2.44 G arrival is the firm side of smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 71.2% indicates that there were some areas that need improvement but there were also some positive aspects to take note of.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it was noted that there was a poor descent path above the glideslope limit. This could have been a contributing factor to the below-average score. However, it's important to acknowledge this as an opportunity for growth and improvement. By working on maintaining a proper descent path, future landings can be smoother and more efficient.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, there were some good aspects such as the threshold height being good. However, there was also a very poor landing flare. This is a crucial part of the landing process as it helps ensure a smooth touchdown. By practicing and refining the landing flare technique, future landings can be improved.
In the Touchdown Phase, it's worth noting that the touchdown rate was very heavy. While the speed was on target, the touchdown point being 135 m beyond the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position being 27.4 m from the centerline show areas where adjustments can be made for better precision and accuracy in future landings.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 27.5 m from the centerline is an area that can be focused on for better alignment and control during the landing rollout.
Overall, while the landing score of 71.2% may not have been as high as desired, it's important to view this as a learning opportunity. By identifying areas for improvement and working on refining techniques, future landings can be more successful and score higher. Keep practicing, stay determined, and remember that every landing is a chance to grow and improve. You've got this!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values