Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,574 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,574 m of the 2,982 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 492 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, congratulations on achieving an aircraft landing score of 85.6%! Your performance demonstrates skill and competency in various aspects of the landing process.
During the Approach Phase, it is noted that the descent path was slightly above the glideslope limit. This could potentially be improved by focusing on more precise altitude control, ensuring a smoother transition during the approach.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, the threshold height was above the target and the landing flare was rated as very poor. By paying closer attention to altitude management and adjusting the timing and technique of the flare, you can aim for a smoother touchdown and reduce the risk of a harder landing.
In the Touchdown Phase, while the touchdown rate was very hard and the speed was slightly above the target, there is room for improvement in achieving a softer touchdown. Additionally, the touchdown point being 78 meters beyond the touchdown zone indicates the need for more accurate positioning during the landing.
Despite these challenges, it is worth noting that you managed to land with an 11 knot crosswind, which requires additional skill and precision. Well done on successfully navigating this condition!
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was slightly off center, with a deviation of 10.0 meters from the centerline. This can be improved by focusing on maintaining straight alignment during the rollout process.
Overall, your performance is commendable, and with a focus on refining certain aspects of your approach, landing, and rollout techniques, you can continue to enhance your skills and achieve even higher scores in future landings. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in your aviation practices.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values