Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,728 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,728 m of the 2,441 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 656 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, it's great to see that the aircraft landing score was at 90.4%! This shows that there were many positive aspects to the landing, but there were also some areas that could be improved upon.
In the Approach Phase, it's noted that the descent path was above the glideslope limit. This could potentially indicate that adjustments need to be made to ensure a more accurate descent path in the future. However, this is a common issue that can be worked on with practice and attention to detail.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, the threshold height being above target and a very poor landing flare are areas that can be improved upon. The threshold height is an important factor in ensuring a smooth and safe landing, so it's recommended to focus on meeting this target in upcoming landings. Additionally, the landing flare plays a significant role in the smoothness of the touchdown, so practicing this technique could lead to improvements in future landings.
In the Touchdown Phase, it's positive to see that the touchdown rate was fair, but the speed being slightly above target and the touchdown point being 244m beyond the touchdown zone suggest that there may be areas for improvement. It's important to focus on controlling speed and aiming for precise touchdowns within the designated zone to enhance overall landing performance.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 6.5m from the centerline highlights an area that could be refined for future landings. Maintaining proper alignment throughout the rollout phase can contribute to a smoother landing experience.
Overall, while there are areas that can be strengthened, it's clear that there are many positive aspects to build upon. By focusing on improving the descent path, threshold height, landing flare, touchdown precision, speed control, and runway alignment, future landings have the potential to achieve even higher scores. Keep up the great work and continue to practice and refine your skills to further enhance your landing performance. Your commitment to improvement is commendable and will undoubtedly lead to continued success in your aviation endeavors.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values