Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Ease the nose up sooner to lift off at 177 kt instead of letting speed build on the ground.
What happened: The aircraft lifted off at 201 kt, 24 kt above the target liftoff speed.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator: 177 kt at liftoff
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Begin raising the nose sooner, at 11 ft, rather than waiting until 6.8 ft.
What happened: The flare began late at 6.8 ft, below the normal band.
Watch for: Radio altimeter approaching 11 ft as the cue to start the flare.
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 30 stages, 28 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 4,010 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 629 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight in question was operated by a Boeing 777-300 aircraft. The journey began with a taxiing period from the parking area to the runway, which took 7 minutes and covered a distance of 5 nautical miles. The aircraft then departed from runway 27L at London Heathrow Airport, with a takeoff distance of 1,967 meters, which was 59% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 201 knots.
As the aircraft climbed to a higher altitude, it encountered a local weather condition of 18°C temperature and a wind speed of 5 knots at 240 degrees. The crosswind was 2 knots, and the headwind was 4 knots. The enroute climb started 1 mile south east of Colnbrook, where the aircraft climbed from 1,165 feet above sea level to 5,311 feet above sea level, an increase of 4,146 feet in 2 minutes, covering a distance of 6 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise started overhead Weybridge, lasting 7 minutes and covering 34 nautical miles. The aircraft then climbed again, this time from 5,442 feet above sea level to 30,498 feet above sea level, an increase of 25,056 feet in 16 minutes, covering a distance of 123 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise started overhead Beerlegem, lasting 38 minutes and covering 337 nautical miles.
The aircraft continued to climb, this time from 30,713 feet above sea level to 32,736 feet above sea level, an increase of 2,023 feet in 3 minutes, covering a distance of 28 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise started 2 miles south east of Waldmunchen, lasting 248 minutes and covering 1,835 nautical miles. The aircraft then climbed again, this time from 33,826 feet above sea level to 35,217 feet above sea level, an increase of 1,392 feet in 2 minutes, covering a distance of 15 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise started 55 miles north of UTMO Ostrov Vozrozhdeniya Airport, lasting 226 minutes and covering 1,889 nautical miles. The aircraft then climbed again, this time from 36,101 feet above sea level to 37,442 feet above sea level, an increase of 1,341 feet in 2 minutes, covering a distance of 15 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise started at a specific latitude and longitude, lasting 130 minutes and covering 974 nautical miles.
As the aircraft began its descent, it started 8 miles north west of ZSCG Changzhou Benniu International Airport, descending from 37,467 feet above sea level to 6,179 feet above sea level, a decrease of 31,287 feet in 20 minutes, covering a distance of 129 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise started 8 miles east of ZSPD Shanghai Pudong International Airport, lasting 8 minutes and covering 30 nautical miles.
The aircraft then continued its descent, this time from 5,876 feet above sea level to 3,108 feet above sea level, a decrease of 2,768 feet in 9 minutes, covering a distance of 29 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise started 17 miles south of ZSPD Shanghai Pudong International Airport, lasting 3 minutes and covering 8 nautical miles. The aircraft then descended again, this time from 2,500 feet above sea level to 1,232 feet above sea level, a decrease of 1,268 feet in 2 minutes, covering a distance of 4 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 35R at ZSPD Shanghai Pudong International Airport was from the
The Boeing 777-300 aircraft successfully landed at ZSPD Shanghai Pudong International Airport, with a score of 88.6%. The final approach to runway 35R was initiated from the south, heading 342.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,209 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft's approach was characterized by a slightly above-target threshold height of 58 feet agl, but a good threshold speed of 147 knots.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft landed 215 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 142 knots, which was slightly faster than the target speed. The touchdown rate of -244 feet per minute (fpm) was considered fair. Additionally, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 7.2 meters from the centerline.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 19°C and wind speeds of 13 knots at 24°. The crosswind component was 9 knots, while the headwind component was 10 knots. The total landing distance of 1,409 meters was 35% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing distance.
During the rollout phase, the aircraft's alignment was slightly misaligned by 8.4 meters from the centerline. Overall, the landing was considered successful, with a score of 88.6%, indicating a good performance by the pilot. However, there were some minor deviations from the target parameters, which could be addressed in future training sessions to improve the pilot's performance.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values