Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Shorten the long landing
Ground effect becomes significant below about one wingspan of height. A Cessna 172, with a 36 ft span, enters ground effect at flare height - the float it feels in the hold-off is ground effect arriving on cue. An A320, with a span around 117 ft, has been in ground effect since before the threshold and there is no sudden cushion to feel, only a gradual reduction in induced drag that lengthens any float you allow.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,204 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,204 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 285 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight in the Douglas DC-3 from Glasgow (EGPF) to Benbecula (EGPL) covered a total distance of 166nm and lasted 84 minutes.
The taxi from the parking to the runway at Glasgow took 12 minutes and covered 2nm. The departure roll from runway 23 at EGPF was 517m, which was 22% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 68 knots. The local weather at the time of departure was 14°C with a 14 knot wind coming from 150°, resulting in a 13 knot crosswind and 3 knot headwind.
The enroute climb started 1 mile northeast of Linwood, climbing from 617 ft asl to 5,415 ft asl in 6 minutes, covering 12nm. The enroute level cruise started over Gourock and lasted 42 minutes, covering 113nm. The enroute descent started 7 miles northeast of Isle of South Uist, descending from 5,917 ft asl to 2,566 ft asl in 7 minutes, covering 22nm.
The second enroute level cruise started 5 miles north of Isle of North Uist and lasted 6 minutes, covering 5nm. The go-around was performed on runway 17 at EGPL Benbecula at 862 ft agl. The landing on runway 17 at EGPL Benbecula had a runway length of 1,204m, with the height at threshold being 45 ft agl. The speed at threshold was 89 knots, with a touchdown speed of 80 knots and a VSI of -295 ft/m. The local weather at the time of landing was 15°C with a 25 knot wind coming from 170°, resulting in a 1 knot crosswind and 24 knot headwind.
The touchdown was 283m from the threshold, with a total landing distance of 724m, which was 60% of the runway. The taxi from the runway to the parking took 3 minutes and covered less than 1nm. The flight used a total of 326kg of fuel.
Firstly, congratulations on achieving a landing score of 93.2%! This demonstrates solid proficiency in various aspects of the landing process. Let's breakdown the analysis further to understand the strengths and areas for improvement in each phase:
Approach Phase: The poor descent path above the glideslope limit suggests that the descent angle may have been steeper than optimal, potentially leading to a higher approach speed. This could contribute to a higher touchdown speed and potentially a firmer landing. It is essential to maintain proper descent profiles to ensure a smooth and controlled approach.
Landing Phase: On the positive side, having a good threshold height and executing a great landing flare are commendable. These aspects play a crucial role in achieving a smooth touchdown and minimizing the impact on the landing gear. However, the speed being slightly above target indicates a need for greater precision in airspeed control during the descent and flare.
Touchdown Phase: The firm touchdown rate suggests that there may have been excessive vertical speed at the moment of touchdown. While a firm landing may not always be avoidable, aiming for a smoother touchdown can help reduce stress on the aircraft structure. The slight overshoot in speed indicates a need for more precise speed control during the final moments of the landing. On a positive note, the touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position being 8.8 m from the centerline show good alignment with the desired touchdown point.
Rollout Phase: The slight deviation in runway alignment (8.1 m from the centerline) during the rollout phase may have resulted from crosswinds or minor directional control adjustments. Maintaining precise runway alignment is crucial for a safe and controlled rollout after touchdown.
In conclusion, while achieving a high landing score is commendable, there are areas within each phase of the landing process that offer opportunities for improvement. Focusing on maintaining proper descent profiles, precise airspeed control, softer touchdown rates, and improved runway alignment can contribute to further enhancing your landing proficiency. Keep up the good work and continue striving for excellence in every phase of the landing sequence.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values