Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Ease the nose up sooner to lift off at 146 kt instead of letting speed build on the ground.
What happened: The aircraft lifted off at 166 kt, 20 kt above the target liftoff speed.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator: 146 kt at liftoff
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Start the flare with progressive back pressure and keep it coming until the sink is arrested.
What happened: The aircraft was flown onto the runway: the nose was barely raised and little of the sink was taken out, touching down at 286 fpm.
Watch for: Pitch attitude: rising steadily through the flare until the sink is checked.
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 22 stages, 20 in the score
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,873 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,873 m of the 2,692 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 785 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 11 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft, a Boeing 777-200ER, then departed from runway 25 at CYOW Ottawa Macdonald-Cartier International Airport. The takeoff distance was 1,604 meters, which accounted for 66% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 166 knots, and the local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 29 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 4 knots at 351 degrees.
As the aircraft climbed out of Ottawa, it began its enroute climb, which started 1 mile southwest of the airport and continued for 24 minutes. During this period, the aircraft ascended from 1,310 feet above sea level to 37,105 feet, an increase of 35,795 feet. The enroute climb covered a distance of 139 nautical miles. Following the initial climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which lasted for 189 minutes and covered a distance of 1,713 nautical miles.
The aircraft then began another enroute climb, this time from a point 1 mile southeast of Nicolet, Quebec, Canada. The climb took 2 minutes and covered a distance of 16 nautical miles, during which the aircraft ascended from 37,060 feet to 38,814 feet. The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, which lasted for 127 minutes and covered a distance of 1,091 nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its descent from a point overhead Deauville, Normandie, France. The descent took 17 minutes and covered a distance of 54 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from 38,511 feet to 10,823 feet. The aircraft then entered a level cruise phase, which lasted for 16 minutes and covered a distance of 17 nautical miles.
The aircraft then began its final descent, which started overhead Hadancourt-le-Haut-Clocher, Hauts-de-France, France. The descent took 8 minutes and covered a distance of 25 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from 10,075 feet to 1,657 feet. The aircraft then began its final approach to runway 09L at LFPG Charles de Gaulle International Airport, which was located to the west.
The final approach was made at a heading of 85.0 degrees, and the aircraft touched down on the runway 370 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was 128 knots, which was within the target range, and the touchdown rate was fair at -201 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 6.2 meters from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 16 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 9 knots at 160 degrees.
The total landing distance was 1,793 meters, which accounted for 67% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was very good. After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, which took 14 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The total flight distance was 3,063 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 408 minutes. The aircraft used a total of 42,820 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 777-200ER aircraft successfully landed at LFPG Charles de Gaulle International Airport, with a score of 90.6%. The final approach to runway 09L was initiated from the west, heading 85.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,301 feet above ground level (agl).
The aircraft touched down on the runway, with a threshold height that was slightly above the target, but the threshold speed was good at 138 knots. The touchdown point was 370 meters beyond the touchdown zone, indicating a slight deviation from the intended landing spot. The touchdown speed of 128 knots was within the acceptable range, but the touchdown rate of -201 feet per minute (fpm) was only fair.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 16°C and a wind speed of 9 knots from a direction of 160°. This resulted in a crosswind of 9 knots and a headwind of 2 knots. The runway length was 2,692 meters, and the aircraft's total landing distance was 1,793 meters, which accounted for 67% of the runway.
Despite the slight deviations in touchdown point and touchdown rate, the runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft's brakes were applied smoothly and effectively. Overall, the landing was considered successful, with a score of 90.6% reflecting the minor deviations from the ideal landing parameters.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values