Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,890 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 503 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight in the Embraer E175 began with a 5-minute taxi from the parking area to the runway, covering 1 nm. The departure roll took place on runway 34L at KSLC Salt Lake City International Airport, with a takeoff distance of 1,565 m (43% of the runway) and a liftoff speed of 154 kn. The local weather at the time of departure was 10°C with a 7 kn wind coming from 310° resulting in a 5 kn crosswind and 5 kn headwind.
The enroute climb started 1 mile northwest of KSLC Salt Lake City International Airport and climbed from 5,217 ft asl to 32,245 ft asl, covering 87 nm in 12 minutes. The cruise at the level began 2 miles northwest of Paris (Idaho, United States) and lasted 16 minutes, covering 208 nm. The descent began 8 miles east of 8ID8 Lewis and Clark Airstrip Salmon (Idaho, United States), descending from 31,295 ft asl to 4,109 ft asl over 18 minutes and covering 94 nm.
The final approach to runway 30 at KMSO Missoula International Airport was from the southeast, heading 313.0° at 3 nm and 908 ft above ground level. The landing on runway 30 at KMSO was conducted with a touchdown point 88 m beyond the touchdown zone, touchdown speed at 122 kn, and a touchdown rate of -299 ft/m. The landing distance covered was 1,155 m (40% of the runway) with the runway rollout alignment being slightly misaligned by 16.2 m from the centerline.
After landing, a 2-minute taxi from the runway to the parking area covered less than 1 nm. The total flight distance was 396 nm, taking 55 minutes and consuming 1,544 kg of fuel. The local weather at the time of landing at KMSO was 1°C with a 6 kn wind from 230°, resulting in a 6 kn crosswind and 1 kn headwind.
Your aircraft landing score of 92.3% is quite impressive and shows a high level of proficiency in various aspects of the landing process. Let's break down the analysis of each phase of the landing to identify areas of improvement.
During the Approach Phase, your glideslope alignment was excellent, indicating a precise descent towards the runway. Additionally, your threshold speed of 129 knots was within the acceptable range, showing good control of the aircraft's speed during the approach. These factors contributed positively to the overall score.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, the good threshold height suggests that you maintained the correct altitude as you approached the runway, ensuring a safe and controlled descent. Furthermore, the very good landing flare indicates a smooth transition from descent to touchdown, which is essential for a successful landing.
However, during the Touchdown Phase, there are a few areas that could be improved. The touchdown rate of -299 ft/m is fair but could be further refined to achieve a smoother landing. Additionally, the touchdown speed of 122 knots was a little fast, which may have contributed to the touchdown point being 88 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone. It is important to adjust your approach speed to ensure a safe and timely touchdown within the designated zone.
Furthermore, the runway touchdown position being misaligned by 11.9 meters from the centerline indicates a need for more precise alignment during the landing phase. Paying closer attention to runway alignment can help improve overall landing accuracy and safety.
Overall, your landing score of 92.3% reflects a high level of skill and proficiency in various aspects of the landing process. By focusing on areas such as touchdown rate, speed, alignment, and precision, you can further enhance your landing performance and strive for even higher scores in the future. Keep up the good work and continue to practice and refine your landing techniques to achieve optimal results.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values