Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,030 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,030 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 31 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 79.5% shows there is room for improvement, but also highlights some areas of success during the landing process.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is concerning that the descent path was below the glideslope limit. This could indicate a need for better communication and coordination between the flight crew to ensure proper altitude and speed adjustments are made during descent. Moving forward, it will be important to address this issue in order to achieve a more precise and safe approach.
During the Landing Phase, the threshold height being excessively below target and the very poor landing flare are areas that require immediate attention. These are critical components of a successful landing and must be executed with precision to ensure safe touchdown and rollout. Additionally, the poor bank angle stability during landing suggests a need for improved aircraft handling skills and coordination between the pilots.
On a positive note, the Touchdown Phase had some successful elements, including a fair touchdown rate and a very good runway touchdown position. However, the speed being slightly above target suggests a need for more attention to detail and precision during the final approach and flare. Continuing to work on these aspects will help improve overall landing performance.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 16.4 m from the centerline indicates a need for improved lateral control and alignment. This can be achieved through consistent practice and attention to detail during the landing process.
Overall, while the landing score may be lower than desired, it is important to focus on the areas that need improvement while also recognizing the successes achieved during the landing. By addressing the identified issues and continuously striving for improvement, the flight crew can work towards achieving a higher landing score and ensuring safer and smoother landings in the future. Keep up the hard work and dedication to excellence in aviation!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values