Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,999 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 439 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft, an Airbus A320, taxiing from the parking area to the runway at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen. This process took 4 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The departure roll took place on runway 19R, and the takeoff distance was 1,560 meters, which is 43% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 148 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it encountered local weather conditions with a temperature of 5 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 2 knots at 180 degrees. The crosswind was 1 knot, and the headwind was 2 knots. After departing from ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, the aircraft began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile south of the airport and reaching an altitude of 34,671 feet above sea level. This climb covered a distance of 106 nautical miles and took 11 minutes, with an increase in altitude of 33,006 feet.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 11 miles northwest of ENEE Sølenstua Airfield Engerdal. This phase lasted for 13 minutes and covered a distance of 401 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 3 miles west of Ballangen and descending from 34,145 feet to 1,703 feet above sea level. This descent covered a distance of 98 nautical miles and took 15 minutes, with a decrease in altitude of 32,442 feet.
The final approach to runway 18 at ENTC Tromsø Airport, Langnes, was made from the north, with a heading of 193.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,666 feet above ground level. The landing took place on a runway with a length of 1,999 meters, and the threshold height was good. The threshold speed was also good at 132 knots, and the touchdown distance was 441 meters, which is 53% of the runway length. The touchdown speed was 125 knots, and the touchdown rate was fair at -217 feet per minute.
The runway touchdown alignment was very good, and the local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of 5 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 7 knots at 230 degrees. The crosswind was 4 knots, and the headwind was 6 knots. The total landing distance was 1,064 meters, and the runway rollout alignment was also very good. After landing, the aircraft taxiied to the parking area, taking 1 minute and covering less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 613 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 47 minutes. The aircraft used 3,113 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at ENTC Tromsø Airport, Langnes, with a score of 98.2%. The aircraft approached the runway from the north, heading 193.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,666 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was executed with precision, and the aircraft touched down on runway 18, which has a length of 1,999 meters.
The threshold height was good, indicating that the aircraft was at the correct altitude as it approached the runway. The threshold speed of 132 knots was also within the acceptable range, demonstrating the pilot's ability to manage the aircraft's speed during the landing. The touchdown distance of 441 meters was also good, indicating that the aircraft was able to touch down within a safe distance from the runway threshold.
The touchdown speed of 125 knots was within the acceptable range, and the touchdown rate of -217 feet per minute (fpm) was fair. However, it is worth noting that a touchdown rate of -217 fpm is slightly higher than the ideal rate, which may indicate some minor issues with the aircraft's descent or the pilot's control of the aircraft during the landing.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were characterized by a temperature of 5°C and a wind speed of 7 knots from 230°. The crosswind component was 4 knots, while the headwind component was 6 knots. Despite these conditions, the aircraft was able to maintain a very good runway touchdown alignment, indicating that the pilot was able to effectively manage the aircraft's trajectory during the landing.
The total landing distance of 1,064 meters was 53% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance. This suggests that the aircraft was able to touch down and come to a stop within a relatively short distance, indicating good control and management of the aircraft during the landing. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, indicating that the aircraft was able to maintain a stable and controlled roll-out after touchdown.
Overall, the landing was executed with precision and control, and the aircraft was able to touch down safely on the runway. The score of 98.2% reflects the high level of proficiency demonstrated by the pilot during the landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values