Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with five checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,996 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 365 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a departure roll from runway 25 at SBSR Prof. Eribelto Manoel Reino State Airport. The aircraft, an Airbus A320, accelerated down the runway and lifted off at a speed of 140 kt, covering a distance of 1,011 m, which was 62% of the runway length. The local weather conditions at the time of takeoff were characterized by a temperature of 28 °C, with a wind speed of 6 kt blowing from 200 °. This resulted in a crosswind of 3 kt and a headwind of 5 kt.
As the aircraft climbed away from the airport, it began its enroute climb 1 mile south west of SBSR Prof. Eribelto Manoel Reino State Airport São José do Rio Preto (Sao Paulo, Brazil). The climb was steep, with the aircraft ascending from 2,870 ft asl to 27,938 ft asl, an increase of 25,068 ft in just 13 minutes. This climb phase covered a distance of 70 nm.
Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 5 miles north west of SDEO Fazenda Entre Rios Airport Ibitinga (Sao Paulo, Brazil). This phase lasted for 13 minutes and covered a distance of 92 nm. The aircraft then began its enroute descent 4 miles north west of Capivari (Sao Paulo, Brazil), descending from 27,881 ft asl to 3,743 ft asl, a decrease of 24,138 ft in 14 minutes. This descent phase covered a distance of 64 nm.
The final approach to runway 10R at SBGR André Franco Montoro International Airport was made from the west, with the aircraft heading 74.0 ° at 4 nm and 1,286 ft agl. The landing was made on runway 10R, which had a length of 2,996 m. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 17 °C, with a wind speed of 6 kt blowing from 99 °. This resulted in a crosswind of 3 kt and a headwind of 5 kt.
The touchdown was smooth, with the aircraft touching down at a speed of 124 kt and a distance of 365 m. The touchdown rate was fair at -236 fpm, but the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.3 m from the centreline. The total landing distance was 1,368 m, which was 46% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating a smooth and controlled deceleration.
After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area from the runway, taking 6 minutes to cover a distance of less than 1 nm. The total flight distance was 233 nm, and the flight duration was 51 minutes. The aircraft used 2,118 kg of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at SBGR André Franco Montoro International Airport, achieving a high score of 98.3%. The aircraft approached the runway from the west, heading 74.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,286 feet above ground level (agl). The pilot executed a precise final approach, ensuring a good threshold height and speed of 130 knots upon touchdown.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on runway 10R, which has a length of 2,996 meters. The touchdown distance of 365 meters was within acceptable limits, and the touchdown speed of 124 knots was also satisfactory. However, the touchdown rate of -236 feet per minute (fpm) was only fair, indicating that the aircraft may have experienced a slightly higher-than-desired rate of descent.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centerline by 5.3 meters, which may have been due to factors such as wind or pilot error. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were relatively calm, with a temperature of 17°C, a wind speed of 6 knots at 99°, and a crosswind of 3 knots and a headwind of 5 knots.
The total landing distance of 1,368 meters was 46% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance considering the aircraft's size and weight. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the pilot maintained control of the aircraft during the rollout phase and avoided any deviations from the centerline.
Overall, the landing was successful, and the pilot demonstrated good control and precision during the approach and touchdown phases. However, there is room for improvement in terms of touchdown rate and runway alignment.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values