Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Use smoother, smaller aileron inputs to keep the wings level and hold bank angle near wings-level during the climb.
What happened: During the climb, bank angle rose to 2.4°, more roll than the climb out called for.
Watch for: Attitude indicator: wings level during the climb
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 15 stages, 14 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: six checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out. These checks are the approach's score.
At the 500 ft gate: gear still up, centreline 4.9° off, against a 1° limit and speed 66 kt FAST on the reference speed of 124 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 5,000 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,000 ft of the 8,942 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 4,464 ft past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The 2.06 G arrival is the firm side of smooth.
The rest of the report
CYVR Vancouver International Airport served as the departure point for the C750, which taxiing from the parking area to runway 26L required 13 minutes and covered 6 nm. The aircraft rolled out on runway 26L, achieving liftoff after a takeoff distance of 2,841 ft, which represented 25 % of the available runway. Liftoff speed was 134 kt under local conditions of 67 °F, a 10‑kt wind from 240°, with a 7‑kt crosswind component and an 8‑kt headwind.
The flight profile progressed through a climb from 870 ft ASL to 44,005 ft ASL, an increase of 43,135 ft over 20 minutes while covering 131 nm. Subsequent cruise segments included a 45‑minute level flight covering 398 nm, followed by a descent from 43,997 ft ASL to 4,977 ft ASL over 27 minutes and 179 nm. Further descent from 4,921 ft ASL to 933 ft ASL occurred over 3 minutes and 11 nm, with a brief 2‑minute cruise of 6 nm. The aircraft then executed a final approach to runway 08 at PAJN Juneau International Airport, maintaining a heading of 97.0° at 2 nm and 470 ft AGL.
Landing on runway 08, which measures 8,429 ft, the threshold height at 73 ft AGL was well above target and the threshold speed was 176 kt. The touchdown point extended beyond 50 % of the available runway, with a touchdown speed of 154 kt and a heavy touchdown rate of –766 fpm. The touchdown position was misaligned by 97 ft from the centreline. Local weather at the destination was 62 °F with a 10‑kt wind from 105°, no crosswind, and a 10‑kt headwind. The total flight distance was 739 nm, the flight duration was 109 minutes, and the aircraft consumed 1,284 lbs of fuel.
The final approach to runway 08 at PAJN Juneau International Airport was conducted from the west, with the aircraft maintaining a heading of 97.0° at 2 nm and 470 ft AGL. The approach quality was acceptable, but the threshold height of 73 ft AGL was well above the target, and the threshold speed of 176 kt was excessively high. These factors contributed to a long approach path and a higher than desired touchdown speed.
Touchdown occurred at a speed of 154 kt, which was excessively fast, and the touchdown rate was very heavy at –766 fpm. The touchdown point was very long, using more than 50 % of the available runway length of 8,429 ft. The aircraft’s runway touchdown position was significantly misaligned by 97 ft from the centreline, indicating a deviation from the desired alignment.
Overall, the landing performance was scored at 51.4 %. The approach, touchdown, and rollout phases were executed with a high threshold speed, a long touchdown point, and a heavy touchdown rate, resulting in a substantial runway misalignment. The local weather conditions—temperature 62 °F, wind 10 kt at 105°, crosswind 0 kt, and headwind 10 kt—were within acceptable limits but did not mitigate the performance issues observed during the landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values