Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the pattern downwind leg
Spacing cues are relative to your eyepoint, so two simmers with different FOV settings following the same wingtip cue fly patterns half a mile different in width, and a wide FOV compresses depth so the runway on base looks further away than it is, biasing you towards a late turn. Pick a camera position and FOV, save it, and never change it, because every judgement you calibrate is calibrated to that picture.
Read more in Pattern WorkStart to finish · 15 stages, 14 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
One stabilised approach gate for a circuit: six checks at the point nearest 500 ft above the runway after the base turn. The 1,000 ft gate is an instrument-approach check and does not apply.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,737 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 750 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight in the Cessna 414A from EGPK Glasgow Prestwick Airport was smooth and successful. The departure roll from runway 12 was quick, with a takeoff distance of 156 m, which was 6% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 115 kt. The local weather at the time of departure was favorable, with a temperature of 20 °C and a light wind of 3 kt at 227 °. There was a slight crosswind of 3 kt and a tailwind of 1 kt.
After takeoff, the aircraft made a right-hand pattern entry back to runway 12 at EGPK. The distance covered in the pattern entry was less than 1 nm and took 27 seconds. The crosswind leg of the pattern was also less than 1 nm and took 10 seconds to complete. The pattern downwind turn covered a distance of 1 nm at an angle to the runway of 52.6 °, while the downwind leg was less than 1 nm and took 7 seconds. The base leg turn covered 2 nm at an angle of 87.2 ° to the runway, and the base leg itself covered 2 nm in 66 seconds. The final turn back to the runway was less than 1 nm and took 26 seconds to complete before the final approach.
The final approach to runway 12 from the northwest was smooth, with the aircraft at a height of 220 ft above ground level at 1 nm away from the runway. The landing on the 2,737 m runway was well-executed, with a touchdown point 316 m beyond the threshold. The touchdown speed of 70 kt was good, and the touchdown rate was a smooth -101 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.8 m from the centerline, but the overall landing was successful.
The total landing distance was 1,254 m, which was 46% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good, allowing for a smooth taxi back to the terminal. The total flight distance for the trip was 8 nm, taking 5 minutes to complete and using 14 kg of fuel. Overall, the flight in the Cessna 414A was well-planned and executed, with favorable weather conditions contributing to a successful journey.
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 95.0% is quite impressive and indicates a high level of proficiency during the landing process.
During the Approach Phase, the glideslope alignment was excellent, which is crucial for ensuring a smooth and safe descent towards the runway. Additionally, maintaining a threshold speed well above the target speed of 95 kt demonstrates good control and preparation for the landing.
Moving onto the Landing Phase, the good threshold height suggests that the pilot was able to accurately judge the height at which to begin the descent towards the runway. However, the poor landing flare indicates that there may have been a slight lack of finesse in the final moments before touchdown. This is an area that can be improved upon with practice and attention to detail.
In the Touchdown Phase, the smooth touchdown rate of -101 ft/m is commendable and shows that the landing was executed with precision and control. The touchdown speed of 70 kt is also within an acceptable range, indicating good speed control during the landing.
However, there are areas for improvement in the Touchdown Phase as well. The touchdown point being 316 m beyond the touchdown zone suggests that adjustments may be needed in order to consistently touch down in the correct location on the runway. Additionally, the slight misalignment of 4.8 m from the runway centerline indicates a need for improved alignment during the landing approach.
Despite these areas for improvement, the overall landing score of 95.0% is a strong result and reflects a high level of skill and competence in aircraft handling. With continued practice and attention to detail, the pilot can further improve their landing technique and achieve even higher scores in the future. Keep up the good work and continue striving for excellence in all aspects of aircraft operations.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values