Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the taxi
Twenty knots on a monitor produces the visual sensation of about ten. The advice to "taxi at a walking pace" cannot fix this, because your sense of walking pace is exactly the thing that's broken. Put the groundspeed readout in your scan and obey it for the next fifty flights, the way a student pilot leans on the airspeed indicator before learning to read attitude.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 16 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,753 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 237 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 94.3% is quite commendable, showcasing a strong performance during the various phases of the landing process.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is noted that the descent path was below the glideslope limit and the speed was well above target. While these factors can be improved upon, it is important to acknowledge that maintaining a precise descent path and speed control can be challenging, especially in varying weather conditions or air traffic. With continued practice and focus on these areas, there is a great opportunity to enhance the overall landing score.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is highlighted that the threshold height was good and the landing flare was executed perfectly. These elements are crucial for ensuring a smooth and safe touchdown, and it is encouraging to see that they were performed effectively. By maintaining consistency in these aspects, further improvements can be achieved in future landings.
In the Touchdown Phase, it is noted that the touchdown rate was firm and the speed was too high. Additionally, the touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position were not optimal. While these areas may have led to a slight decrease in the landing score, they present valuable learning opportunities for refining technique and improving precision during touchdown. By focusing on maintaining a consistent and controlled approach, adjustments can be made to address these areas in future landings.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, it is observed that the runway alignment was slightly off, being 5.2 meters from the centerline. While maintaining proper runway alignment is essential for a safe landing, this deviation can be corrected with practice and attention to detail. By honing alignment skills and ensuring a smooth rollout, further enhancements can be made to achieve a higher landing score.
Overall, this analysis highlights both the strengths and areas for improvement in the aircraft landing process. With dedication, practice, and a focus on continuous improvement, there is great potential to elevate the landing score even further in future flights. Keep up the good work and continue striving for excellence in each landing. Well done!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values