Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 6.8 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Wait for the normal flare band and the correct speed before raising the nose, rather than starting the flare at 84 ft.
What happened: The flare began at 84 ft, 39 ft above the normal band, and the touchdown followed at 267 fpm. Starting the flare this early usually carries through to a firmer arrival than a flare begun in the normal band.
Watch for: Radio altimeter: hold the flare start within the normal flare band
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 26 stages, 24 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,837 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,837 m of the 2,692 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 571 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight in question was operated by a Boeing 777-300 aircraft. The aircraft began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 6 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile (nm). The departure roll took place on runway 32R at SKBO El Dorado International Airport, with a takeoff distance of 2,633 meters, which accounted for 69% of the runway. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 174 knots (kt).
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 21 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 1 kt at 287 degrees. The crosswind was negligible, while the headwind was 1 kt. As the aircraft began its enroute climb, it started at an altitude of 9,397 feet above sea level (asl) and gradually increased to 30,589 ft asl over a distance of 105 nm in 16 minutes.
The enroute level cruise phase began approximately 1 mile south of Beteitiva, Colombia, and lasted for 55 minutes, covering a distance of 453 nm. The aircraft then entered another enroute climb phase, this time from 30,520 ft asl to 32,509 ft asl, over a distance of 29 nm in just 3 minutes. The subsequent enroute level cruise phase lasted for 176 minutes, covering a distance of 1,453 nm.
The flight continued with multiple enroute climb and level cruise phases, each with varying altitudes and distances covered. Notably, the aircraft climbed from 33,118 ft asl to 35,125 ft asl in just 3 minutes, covering 28 nm. The final enroute level cruise phase lasted for 224 minutes, covering a distance of 1,723 nm.
As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its enroute descent phase, starting 3 miles north of Courseulles-sur-Mer, France. The descent from 36,927 ft asl to 12,224 ft asl took 11 minutes, covering a distance of 84 nm. The aircraft then entered another enroute level cruise phase, lasting 3 minutes and covering 22 nm.
The final descent phase began 1 mile south east of Ully-Saint-Georges, France, and took the aircraft from 12,002 ft asl to 1,676 ft asl in 12 minutes, covering a distance of 20 nm. The aircraft then began its final approach to runway 27R at LFPG Charles de Gaulle International Airport, heading 265.0 degrees at 4 nm and 1,319 feet above ground level (agl).
The landing took place on runway 27R, which had a length of 2,692 meters. The threshold height at 64 ft agl was above the target, while the threshold speed was good at 146 kt. The touchdown point was 163 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 144 kt, which was a little fast. The touchdown rate was fair at -292 feet per minute (fpm), and the runway touchdown alignment was very good.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 7 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 4 kt at 240 degrees. The crosswind was 2 kt, while the headwind was 4 kt. The total landing distance was 1,764 meters, which accounted for 66% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was perfect.
After landing, the aircraft taxiied to the parking area, a process that took 5 minutes and covered less than 1 nm. The total flight distance was 4,764 nm, taking 629 minutes, and the aircraft used 83,301 kg of fuel during the journey.
The Boeing 777-300 aircraft successfully landed at LFPG Charles de Gaulle International Airport on runway 27R, achieving a score of 91.5%. The final approach was initiated from the east, heading 265.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,319 feet above ground level (agl).
The aircraft's performance during the landing was satisfactory, with the threshold height at 64 feet agl being above the target. However, the threshold speed was good, reaching 146 knots. The touchdown point was 163 meters beyond the touchdown zone, indicating a slight deviation from the ideal landing spot. The touchdown speed of 144 knots was a bit faster than desired, but the touchdown rate of -292 feet per minute (fpm) was considered fair.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 7°C, with a wind speed of 4 knots at 240°. The crosswind component was minimal at 2 knots, while the headwind component was 4 knots. These conditions did not significantly impact the aircraft's performance during the landing.
The total landing distance of 1,764 meters was 66% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing distance. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, demonstrating the pilot's skill and control during the landing phase. Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft achieving a high score despite some minor deviations from the ideal performance.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values