Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Ease the nose up sooner to lift off at 81 kt instead of letting speed build on the ground.
What happened: The aircraft lifted off at 93 kt, 12 kt above the target liftoff speed.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator: 81 kt at liftoff
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Keep the back pressure coming through the flare so the sink does not return at 157 fpm.
What happened: The flare arrested the sink, but then the sink returned before touchdown.
Watch for: Watch the VSI in the flare and keep arrested sink from returning before touchdown at 148 fpm.
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 11 stages, 10 in the score
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate for a circuit: seven checks where the approach path is 300 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate is an instrument-approach check and does not apply.
At the 300 ft gate: no landing flap set and off the centreline.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,492 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 952 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Groningen Airport Eelde, the GA-8 Airvan Commuter Cargopod began its takeoff roll on runway 05, accelerating to a liftoff speed of 93 kt. The aircraft utilized 77% of the available runway length, covering a distance of 1,911 meters before lifting off into the air. Local conditions were favorable, with a temperature of 20 °C and a gentle tailwind of 3 kt from a direction of 223 °.
As the aircraft entered the left-hand traffic pattern, it demonstrated its agility by completing the pattern entry in less than 1 nm in 39 seconds. The subsequent crosswind leg was similarly efficient, with the aircraft covering the distance in 27 seconds. The final approach to runway 23 was initiated from the north-east, with the aircraft descending to an altitude of 393 ft above ground level (agl) at a distance of 1 nm from the runway threshold. The approach was characterized by a heading of 205.0 °, and the aircraft touched down smoothly at a speed of 56 kt, with a touchdown rate of -120 fpm.
The landing was deemed successful, with the touchdown point located 511 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, and the runway rollout alignment was perfect. The aircraft utilized 47% of the available runway length, covering a distance of 1,178 meters. The total flight distance was 4 nm, and the flight duration was 3 minutes. Notably, the aircraft consumed 64 kg of fuel during the flight.
The final approach to runway 23 at EHGG Groningen Airport Eelde was initiated from the north east, heading 205.0° at 1 nm and 393 ft above ground level. The aircraft maintained a stable and controlled descent throughout the approach, with a good threshold height achieved. However, the threshold speed was slightly above the target, registering 86 kt.
As the aircraft touched down on the runway, it demonstrated a smooth touchdown rate of -120 fpm, with a speed of 56 kt. The touchdown point was located 511 m beyond the touchdown zone, indicating a slight overrun. Despite this, the runway touchdown alignment was very good, showcasing the pilot's skill and control. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 20 °C and a gentle headwind of 3 kt, contributed to a stable and predictable approach.
The aircraft's rollout was characterized by perfect alignment, with the aircraft remaining centered on the runway. The total landing distance of 1,178 m, accounting for 47% of the runway length, was within acceptable limits. Overall, the landing performance scored 84.6%, reflecting a solid execution of the approach and touchdown phases, with some minor deviations in terms of threshold speed and touchdown point.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values