Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,855 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,855 m of the 3,662 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 727 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Our flight in the Boeing 747-8 began at YSSY Kingsford Smith Intl in Sydney. The taxi from the parking area to the runway took 6 minutes, covering a distance of 2 nautical miles. We departed from runway 34L, with a takeoff distance of 3,486 feet, which was 27% of the runway length. Our liftoff speed was 160 knots. The local weather at the time of departure was 63°F with no wind affecting the takeoff.
As we climbed enroute, we started our ascent over Tempe in New South Wales. Climbing from 1,056 feet above sea level to 36,020 feet, we gained 34,964 feet in altitude over 11 minutes, covering a distance of 51 nautical miles. Once we reached our cruising altitude, which began one mile southwest of YRBN Robertson Airstrip Calderwood, we maintained level flight for 30 minutes, covering 202 miles.
Our descent began seven miles north of Mount Beauty in Victoria. Descending from 35,896 feet to 1,880 feet, we decreased in altitude by 34,016 feet over 28 minutes, covering a distance of 135 nautical miles. We landed at YMML Melbourne Intl on runway 34, which has a length of 12,015 feet. Our height at the threshold was 59 feet above ground level, with a speed of 145 knots. The weather at Melbourne was 58°F, with a 6 knot wind coming from 299°, providing a slight crosswind and headwind during landing.
Our touchdown occurred 2,386 feet from the threshold, with a touchdown speed of 136 knots and a Vertical Speed Indicator reading of -134 feet per minute. The total landing distance was 5,808 feet, which accounted for 48% of the runway length. Taxiing from the runway to the parking area took us 3 minutes, covering less than 1 nautical mile.
Overall, our flight covered a total distance of 402 nautical miles and lasted 83 minutes. We consumed 22,468 pounds of fuel throughout the journey.
Congratulations on achieving a landing score of 90.6%! Overall, you demonstrated strong skills in the Approach and Touchdown Phases, but there are areas that can be improved upon in the Landing and Rollout Phases.
In the Approach Phase, your glideslope alignment was excellent, which indicates a good sense of spatial awareness and ability to control the descent of the aircraft. Your speed being slightly below target suggests that you were able to maintain a smooth and controlled approach.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it's great to see that your touchdown rate was smooth and that you were able to maintain the target speed. However, there were some areas that need improvement. The threshold height being slightly above target indicates that you may need to work on your altitude control during the final approach. Additionally, having a very poor landing flare suggests that you may have flared too late or too aggressively, resulting in a less-than-ideal touchdown.
During the Touchdown Phase, despite a smooth touchdown, the fact that the touchdown point was 1007 ft beyond the touchdown zone is a concern. This could be due to an improper approach or inadequate touchdown point identification. However, it's worth noting that the runway touchdown position was very good, which shows good control and landing accuracy.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, maintaining a 20 ft deviation from the centerline suggests a need for improved runway alignment control. This can be improved through practice and continued attention to detail during the landing phase.
Overall, your performance was commendable, and with some adjustments and continued practice, you can further improve your landing technique. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in all phases of aircraft landing. Well done!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values