Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Hold the approach aim point and let the aircraft settle onto 457 m instead of holding it off in the flare.
What happened: Touchdown point came 79 m past the target, landing at 536 m against the 457 m aim point, with threshold speed and the flare both within limits.
Watch for: Touchdown distance marker: 457 m from the threshold.
Below 10,000 ft you are typically limited to 250 kt indicated (a US rule that much of the world mirrors in some form, though not universally). This forces a deceleration around 10,000 ft whether the profile wants one or not, so plan for it rather than discovering it.
Read more in Descent PlanningStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,183 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 536 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Taxiing from the parking area to the runway at Phnom Penh International Airport took approximately 8 minutes, covering a distance of 2 nautical miles. The Boeing 737-600 then began its departure roll on runway 23, utilizing 31% of the available runway length to achieve liftoff at a speed of 137 knots. The local weather conditions at the time of departure featured a temperature of 37°C, with a gentle headwind of 3 knots from a direction of 225°.
As the aircraft climbed away from Phnom Penh, it began its enroute climb, reaching an altitude of 39,826 feet above sea level in 22 minutes, covering a distance of 136 nautical miles. The climb phase was followed by a prolonged enroute level cruise, which lasted for 141 minutes and spanned a distance of 839 nautical miles. The aircraft then commenced its enroute descent, reducing its altitude from 40,000 feet to 1,300 feet in 23 minutes, covering a distance of 144 nautical miles. The descent phase concluded with the initiation of the final approach to runway 32 at Hazrat Shahjalal International Airport.
The Boeing 737-600 touched down on runway 32 at a speed of 120 knots, with a smooth touchdown rate of -148 feet per minute. The touchdown point was located 112 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, and the runway touchdown alignment was deemed very good. The total landing distance covered 31% of the available runway length, and the runway rollout alignment was perfect. Following a short taxiing period of 1 minute, the aircraft arrived at the parking area, having completed a total flight distance of 1,127 nautical miles in 176 minutes, with a fuel consumption of 6,271 kilograms.
The Boeing 737-600 touched down on runway 32 at VGHS Hazrat Shahjalal International Airport with a smooth touchdown rate of -148 fpm, indicating a well-executed approach. The aircraft's speed at touchdown was 120 kt, which was within the acceptable range, and the threshold speed of 129 kt was also satisfactory. The touchdown point was 112 m beyond the touchdown zone, a relatively short distance, suggesting a good approach quality.
The approach to runway 32 from the south east, heading 324.0 ° at 4 nm and 1,261 ft agl, was characterized by a good threshold height, allowing the pilots to maintain a stable approach path. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 29 °C and a light wind of 3 kt at 100 °, contributed to a relatively straightforward landing. The crosswind and tailwind components were minimal, at 2 kt each, which further facilitated a smooth touchdown.
The aircraft's rollout on runway 32 was flawless, with perfect alignment to the centreline. The total landing distance of 1,002 m, which accounted for 31% of the runway length, was within the acceptable range. Overall, the landing was considered excellent, with a score of 99.1%, reflecting the pilots' skill and attention to detail in executing a safe and efficient landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values