Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Configure earlier
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: off the centreline and speed above the reference speed.
At the 500 ft gate: off the centreline.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,784 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 155 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 4 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-600, then departed from runway 35 at RJCB Tokachi-Obihiro Airport in Japan. The takeoff distance was 1,024 meters, which accounted for 41% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 150 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 12 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 7 knots from a direction of 350 degrees. This resulted in a headwind of 7 knots and a crosswind of 1 knot. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile north of RJCB Tokachi-Obihiro Airport and ascending from an altitude of 1,467 feet above sea level to 39,030 feet above sea level. This climb, which covered a distance of 299 nautical miles, took 37 minutes and resulted in an increase of 37,563 feet in altitude.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 69 miles north of UHSI Iturup Airport in Russia. This phase of the flight lasted for 145 minutes and covered a distance of 1,879 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 35 miles north of Shishmaref in Alaska, United States. The descent, which covered a distance of 67 nautical miles, took 11 minutes and resulted in a decrease of 38,026 feet in altitude, from 39,316 feet above sea level to 1,290 feet above sea level.
The final approach to runway 09 at PAOT Ralph Wien Memorial Airport in Alaska was made from the west, with the aircraft heading 100.0 degrees at an altitude of 1,247 feet above ground level and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway. The landing was made on runway 09, which had a length of 1,784 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was also satisfactory at 131 knots. The touchdown distance was good at 154 meters, but the touchdown speed of 128 knots was a little fast. The touchdown rate was good at -173 feet per minute.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 0 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 4 knots from a direction of 244 degrees. This resulted in a tailwind of 3 knots and a crosswind of 2 knots. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centerline by 6.9 meters. The total landing distance was 688 meters, which accounted for 39% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was very good.
The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 1 minute and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 2,251 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 200 minutes. The aircraft used a total of 12,139 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-600 aircraft successfully landed at PAOT Ralph Wien Memorial Airport, achieving a score of 98.3%. The final approach to runway 09 was initiated from the west, heading 100.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,247 feet above ground level.
The aircraft touched down on the runway with a threshold speed of 131 knots, which was considered good. The touchdown distance of 154 meters was also within acceptable limits. However, the touchdown speed of 128 knots was slightly higher than desired, indicating that the pilot may have been able to flare the aircraft more effectively to achieve a smoother touchdown.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centerline by 6.9 meters, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the pilot's alignment during the final approach. Despite this, the touchdown rate of -173 feet per minute was considered good, indicating that the aircraft was able to absorb the impact of touchdown smoothly.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 0°C, with a wind speed of 4 knots from 244°. The crosswind component was minimal at 2 knots, while the tailwind component was 3 knots. These conditions were relatively calm, which likely contributed to the smoothness of the landing.
The total landing distance of 688 meters was 39% of the runway length, indicating that the aircraft was able to stop within a reasonable distance. The runway rollout alignment was very good, suggesting that the pilot was able to maintain control of the aircraft during the rollout phase and bring it to a stop safely. Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft achieving a high score and demonstrating good control and handling characteristics.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values