Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 24 stages, 23 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 4,065 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 201 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, your aircraft landing score of 83.8% shows room for improvement in various phases of the landing process. While there were some areas that were executed well, such as the touchdown rate being fair and touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone, there are clear areas that need attention.
During the Approach Phase, it is important to maintain a descent path within the glideslope limits to ensure a smooth and safe landing. It appears that the descent path was below the glideslope limit in this case, indicating a need for better monitoring and adjustment of the aircraft's approach.
In the Landing Phase, the threshold height being significantly below target and a very poor landing flare suggest that there were issues with the precision and control of the descent. It is crucial to hit the target threshold height and execute a proper landing flare to ensure a smooth touchdown.
Additionally, in the Touchdown Phase, while the touchdown rate was fair, the speed being slightly above target and the touchdown position 4.0 m from the centerline indicate a need for better control and coordination during this critical phase of the landing process.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 5.0 m from the centerline suggests a need for improved alignment and control of the aircraft during the rollout after touchdown.
Despite these areas for improvement, it is important to remember that landing an aircraft is a complex and challenging task that requires practice and skill. By identifying the specific areas that need attention and focusing on improving them, you can work towards achieving higher scores and mastering the art of landing an aircraft with precision and confidence. Keep practicing, stay focused, and never stop striving for excellence in your flying skills. With dedication and determination, you can continue to improve and excel in your landings. Fly safe!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values