Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the approach angle
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 22 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,075 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 463 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 10 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-800, then departed from runway 08 at LOWI Innsbruck Airport. The takeoff distance was 1,381 meters, which accounted for 73% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 155 knots, and the local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 18°C, a wind speed of 17 knots at 140°, with a crosswind of 15 knots and a headwind of 9 knots.
As the aircraft climbed to a higher altitude, it began its enroute climb, which started overhead Innsbruck, Austria. The climb took 25 minutes and covered a distance of 127 nautical miles, during which the aircraft ascended from 2,938 feet above sea level to 35,248 feet above sea level, an increase of 32,309 feet. Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise, which started 2 miles south of Oberasbach, Germany, and lasted for 9 minutes, covering a distance of 62 nautical miles.
The aircraft then began its enroute descent, which started 2 miles south of Neuendorf, Germany. The descent took 12 minutes and covered a distance of 78 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from 35,039 feet above sea level to 12,877 feet above sea level, a decrease of 22,162 feet. After the descent, the aircraft entered another level cruise, which started 1 mile northwest of Deesen, Germany, and lasted for 5 minutes, covering a distance of 70 nautical miles.
The aircraft then began another enroute descent, which started 2 miles north of Dison, Belgium. The descent took 7 minutes and covered a distance of 44 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from 12,851 feet above sea level to 4,424 feet above sea level, a decrease of 8,427 feet. Following the descent, the aircraft entered another level cruise, which started 1 mile southwest of Aarschot, Belgium, and lasted for 2 minutes, covering a distance of 4 nautical miles.
The aircraft then began its final descent, which started overhead Werchter, Belgium. The descent took 2 minutes and covered a distance of 4 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from 4,131 feet above sea level to 1,869 feet above sea level, a decrease of 2,261 feet. The aircraft then began its final approach to runway 25R at EBBR Brussels Airport, which was located to the northeast, with a heading of 244.0° at 3 nautical miles and 1,694 feet above ground level.
The aircraft landed on runway 25R at EBBR Brussels Airport, which had a length of 3,075 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was a little below the target at 126 knots. The touchdown distance was good at 465 meters, and the touchdown speed was 114 knots, which was also good. The touchdown rate was good at -184 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was perfect. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 16°C, a wind speed of 6 knots at 130°, with a crosswind of 5 knots and a tailwind of 3 knots.
After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking from the runway, which took 4 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 397 nautical miles, and the total flight time was 79 minutes. The aircraft used 4,012 kilograms of fuel during the
The Boeing 737-800 aircraft successfully landed at Brussels Airport (EBBR) on runway 25R, achieving a high score of 97.2%. The final approach was initiated from the north-east, heading 244.0° at a distance of 3 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,694 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft's approach was characterized by a good threshold height, indicating a stable and controlled descent.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's threshold speed was slightly below the target speed of 126 knots, but still within acceptable limits. The touchdown distance of 465 meters was also considered good, demonstrating a smooth and controlled landing. The touchdown speed of 114 knots was within the desired range, and the touchdown rate of -184 feet per minute (fpm) was also good, indicating a gentle and controlled impact with the runway.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 16°C and a wind speed of 6 knots from a direction of 130°. The crosswind component was 5 knots, while the tailwind component was 3 knots. Despite these wind conditions, the aircraft's landing was still considered good, with a total landing distance of 1,100 meters, which accounted for 36% of the runway length.
The runway rollout alignment was also very good, indicating that the aircraft's brakes were applied smoothly and effectively, allowing for a controlled deceleration. Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft demonstrating a high level of control and precision throughout the approach and touchdown phases.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values