Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 34 ft off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Apply steady, continuous back pressure through the flare to arrest the sink smoothly and hold the normal profile, rather than letting it drift.
What happened: The flare did not hold its target profile, with the sink most arrested at 0.5 ft, and this flight then touched down at 256 fpm of sink - a firm arrival. An unsettled flare profile like this usually carries through to a firmer touchdown.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: a smooth, steadily decreasing sink rate through the flare to touchdown.
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 5,238 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,238 ft of the 7,571 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 1,401 ft touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 9 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-800, then departed from runway 19R at Tampa International Airport (KTPA) in Tampa, Florida. The takeoff distance was 3,860 feet, which was 35% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 156 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it encountered local weather conditions with a temperature of 98°F and winds of 5 knots at 250°. The crosswind was 5 knots, and the headwind was 2 knots. After departing from KTPA, the aircraft began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile south of the airport and climbing from 1,039 feet above sea level to 36,548 feet above sea level, an increase of 35,509 feet in 20 minutes and covering 127 nautical miles.
The enroute climb was followed by a level cruise, which started 3 miles south of Delta Airport (FD84) in Lake City, Florida, and lasted 83 minutes, covering 663 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 1 mile southeast of Poland, Ohio, and descending from 36,773 feet above sea level to 8,969 feet above sea level, a decrease of 27,804 feet in 21 minutes and covering 135 nautical miles.
The enroute descent was followed by another level cruise, which started 1 mile southeast of West Seneca, New York, and lasted 5 minutes, covering 18 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final descent, starting 3 miles northwest of Akron, New York, and descending from 8,890 feet above sea level to 2,011 feet above sea level, a decrease of 6,879 feet in 7 minutes and covering 7 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 23 at Buffalo Niagara International Airport (KBUF) was made from the northeast, heading 224.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,318 feet above ground level. The landing was made on runway 23, which was 7,571 feet long. The threshold height was above target at 66 feet above ground level, and the threshold speed was well above target at 147 knots.
The touchdown distance was good at 1,408 feet, and the touchdown speed was 144 knots, which was fast. The touchdown rate was hard at -420 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of 64°F and winds of 2 knots at 180°, with a crosswind of 2 knots and a headwind of 2 knots.
The total landing distance was 5,003 feet, which was 66% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 5 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 959 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 152 minutes. The aircraft used 13,708 pounds of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-800 aircraft successfully landed at KBUF Buffalo Niagara International Airport, with a score of 93.4%. The final approach to runway 23 was initiated from the north east, heading 224.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,318 feet above ground level (agl).
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on the runway, with a touchdown distance of 1,408 feet, which was considered good. However, the touchdown speed of 144 knots was slightly faster than the target speed, indicating a slightly harder landing than desired. The touchdown rate of -420 feet per minute (fpm) was also considered hard, suggesting that the aircraft may have experienced a bit of a jolt upon touchdown.
Despite the slightly faster touchdown speed and harder touchdown rate, the runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating that the aircraft was well-aligned with the runway centerline at the moment of touchdown. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 64°F and a light wind of 2 knots from 180°, resulting in a negligible crosswind and headwind component.
The total landing distance of 5,003 feet was 66% of the available runway length of 7,571 feet, indicating that the aircraft had sufficient runway remaining to safely stop after touchdown. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, suggesting that the aircraft was well-controlled and stable during the rollout phase.
Overall, while there were some minor issues with the touchdown speed and rate, the landing was considered successful, with a high score of 93.4%. The aircraft's performance and handling were well within acceptable limits, and the pilots demonstrated good control and management of the aircraft during the landing phase.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values