Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 152 m above the runway. The 305 m gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,203 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 274 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 8 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft, an ATR 72, then departed from runway 05 at LIEO Olbia Costa Smeralda Airport. The takeoff distance was 987 meters, which is 40% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 123 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 31 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 11 knots from a direction of 69 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 3 knots and a headwind of 11 knots. The aircraft began its enroute climb 1 mile northeast of LIEO Olbia Costa Smeralda Airport, rising from an altitude of 311 meters above sea level to 5,522 meters above sea level, an increase of 5,211.4 meters, in 17 minutes and covering a distance of 58 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise started 52 miles northeast of Porto Cervo, Sardegna, Italy, and lasted for 16 minutes, covering a distance of 72 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent 2 miles west of LIWF Campo di Volo Poggio Primavera Tuscania, Lazio, Italy, descending from 5,644 meters above sea level to 642 meters above sea level, a decrease of 5,002.2 meters, in 13 minutes and covering a distance of 51 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 01 at LIRZ San Francesco d'Assisi – Umbria International Airport was made from the south, heading 15.0 degrees at an altitude of 431.2 meters above ground level and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway. The landing was made on runway 01, which has a length of 2,203 meters. The threshold height was good, but the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 116 knots.
The touchdown distance was good at 274 meters, but the touchdown speed was a little fast at 111 knots. The touchdown rate was firm at -1.6 meters per second. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.6 meters from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 29 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 6 knots from a direction of 240 degrees, resulting in a crosswind of 5 knots and a tailwind of 4 knots.
The total landing distance was 701 meters, which is 32% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 8.4 meters from the centerline. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 3 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 190 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 58 minutes. The aircraft used 523 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The ATR 72 aircraft successfully landed at LIRZ San Francesco d'Assisi – Umbria International Airport, achieving a score of 96.3%. The final approach to runway 01 was conducted from the south, with a heading of 15.0° at an altitude of 431.2 meters above ground level (agl) and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on the runway with a speed of 116 knots, which was slightly above the target threshold speed. The touchdown distance of 274 meters was considered good, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. However, the touchdown speed of 111 knots was a little fast, suggesting that the pilot may have been able to flare the aircraft more effectively to reduce the speed.
The touchdown rate of -1.6 meters per second was firm, indicating a controlled and stable touchdown. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.6 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the approach path or a minor error in the pilot's alignment.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 29°C and a wind speed of 6 knots from a direction of 240°. The crosswind component was 5 knots, while the tailwind component was 4 knots. These conditions were relatively calm and did not pose a significant challenge to the landing.
The total landing distance of 701 meters was 32% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 8.4 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to a minor error in the pilot's alignment or a slight deviation in the aircraft's trajectory during the rollout.
Overall, the landing was considered successful, with a high score of 96.3%. However, there were some minor deviations in the approach and rollout, which may have been due to a combination of factors including pilot error, aircraft performance, and weather conditions.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values