Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 17 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 2,780 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 2,780 m of the 3,196 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 695 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 6 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-MAX8, then departed from runway 25 at LIPH Treviso Antonio Canova Airport. The takeoff distance was 1,547 meters, which accounted for 69% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 171 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were a temperature of 10 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 5 knots at 83 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 1 knot and a tailwind of 5 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting overhead Quinto di Treviso in Veneto, Italy. The climb took 17 minutes and covered 99 nautical miles, with the aircraft rising from 1,084 feet above sea level to 32,477 feet.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise, starting 4 miles south of Umhausen in Tirol, Austria. This phase of the flight lasted 18 minutes and covered 143 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting overhead Leingarten in Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. The descent took 21 minutes and covered 87 nautical miles, with the aircraft decreasing from 32,926 feet to 2,883 feet.
The final approach to runway 21 at EDFH Frankfurt-Hahn Airport was made from the north-east, with a heading of 212.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,237 feet above ground level. The landing was made on runway 21, which had a length of 3,196 meters. The threshold height was good, but the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 147 knots. The touchdown point was 285 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was 140 knots, which was a little fast. The touchdown rate was fair at -214 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was perfect.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of -3 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 4 knots at 189 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 2 knots and a headwind of 4 knots. The total landing distance was 2,706 meters, which accounted for 85% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was perfect. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 7 minutes and covered 1 nautical mile.
In total, the flight distance was 337 nautical miles, and the flight took 71 minutes. The aircraft used 2,488 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-MAX8 aircraft successfully landed at EDFH Frankfurt-Hahn Airport, showcasing a high level of proficiency in its flight operations. The final approach to runway 21 was initiated from the north east, with a heading of 212.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,237 feet above ground level (agl). This approach was executed with precision, as evidenced by the perfect runway touchdown alignment.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down 285 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, which is slightly beyond the ideal spot. However, the touchdown speed of 140 knots was a bit faster than the target speed, indicating that the pilots may have been able to make adjustments to reduce the speed during the approach. The touchdown rate of -214 feet per minute was considered fair, suggesting that the aircraft's descent was not excessively steep.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of -3°C and a wind speed of 4 knots from a direction of 189°. This resulted in a crosswind of 2 knots and a headwind of 4 knots, which the pilots effectively managed during the landing. The runway length of 3,196 meters was more than sufficient to accommodate the aircraft's landing distance of 2,706 meters, which accounted for 85% of the available runway.
The runway rollout alignment was also perfect, indicating that the pilots maintained control of the aircraft during the post-landing phase. Overall, this landing demonstrates a high level of skill and expertise on the part of the pilots, as well as the aircraft's capabilities. The score of 90.9% reflects the successful execution of the landing, with only minor deviations from the ideal performance.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values