Track every flight, analyse your performance,
and master your flying skills with My FS Flights
Get 10 flights free every month!
Tracked and analysed flights over miles
The flight in question was operated by an Airbus A330 aircraft, which began its enroute climb from a location 1 mile southeast of Campo di Volo Sangermano Valcanneto in Lazio, Italy. The aircraft took off from an altitude of 3,192 feet above sea level and climbed to 1,825 feet above sea level, a vertical increase of 1,367 feet, within a span of just 3 minutes. During this climb, the aircraft covered a horizontal distance of 7 nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its final approach to runway 16R at Rome–Fiumicino Leonardo da Vinci International Airport. The approach was made from the north, with the aircraft heading in a direction of 163.0 degrees at an altitude of 1,796 feet above ground level and a distance of 3 nautical miles from the runway. The aircraft maintained a steady heading and altitude as it prepared for landing.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on runway 16R, which has a length of 3,905 meters. The threshold height at which the aircraft touched down was significantly above the target height, but the threshold speed was good at 144 knots. The touchdown distance was also good, measuring 417 meters, and the touchdown speed was within acceptable limits at 134 knots. However, the touchdown rate was very heavy, with a rate of -1,144 feet per minute.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 10 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 3 knots from a direction of 75 degrees. There was no crosswind or headwind present. The total landing distance covered by the aircraft was 916 meters, which accounted for 23% of the runway length. Unfortunately, the runway rollout alignment was excessively misaligned from the centerline by 47.8 meters.
In terms of the overall flight performance, the aircraft covered a total distance of 10 nautical miles and used a total of -10 kilograms of fuel. The flight duration was 4 minutes, indicating a relatively short and efficient flight.
Replay this flight in 3D — the full flight path over the terrain with every stage, event and score along the route.
Enroute climb started 1 mile south east of LIXU Campo di Volo Sangermano Valcanneto (Lazio, Italy). Climbing from 3,192 ft asl to 1,825 ft asl, an increase of 1,367 ft in 3 minutes and covering 7 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 93.36 % |
Average speed 190 kt 140 kt min to max 412 kt |
412 | 147 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.7 ° 0.0 ° min to max 2.8 ° |
0.0 | 0.3 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.95 g min to max 1.09 g |
1.03 | 0.96 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -288 fpm -1,490 fpm min to max 3,687 fpm |
3,687 | -1,250 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 2,608 ft asl 1,825 ft asl min to max 3,231 ft asl |
3,192 | 1,825 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.1 ° -1.3 ° min to max 7.2 ° |
5.0 | -1.3 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Pitot Heat Switched Off at 11:53:47 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Lights Switched On at 11:53:56 |
|||
| Info |
Taxi Lights Switched On at 11:54:07 |
|||
| Info |
Autopilot Wing Leveler Activated at 11:54:07 |
|||
| Info |
Autopilot Flight Director Activated at 11:54:07 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Fully Retracted at 11:54:07 |
|||
| Info |
Taxi Lights Switched Off at 11:54:10 |
|||
| Info |
Autopilot Vertical Hold Activated at 11:54:11 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 4 at 11:54:11 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Gear Down at 11:54:14 |
|||
| Info |
Taxi Lights Switched On at 11:54:18 |
|||
| Info |
Exceeded 250 kn below 10000 ft at 11:53:55 |
Approaching runway 16R at LIRF Rome–Fiumicino Leonardo da Vinci International Airport from 4 nm to 3 nm. Descent from 1,796 ft agl to 1,353 ft agl. A decrease of 443 ft in 19 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 21.08 % |
Approach angle 4.9 ° 4.9 ° min to max 5.0 ° Target 3.0 ° |
4.9 | 4.9 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 155 kt 147 kt min to max 163 kt |
147 | 163 kt | |
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.4 ° 0.3 ° min to max 0.4 ° |
0.4 | 0.3 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.8 ° 0.0 ° min to max 2.4 ° |
0.3 | 1.5 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.95 g min to max 1.05 g |
0.96 | 1.00 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -1,332 fpm -1,451 fpm min to max -1,186 fpm |
-1,312 | -1,446 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 1,575 ft agl 1,353 ft agl min to max 1,796 ft agl |
1,796 | 1,353 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -1.7 ° -2.4 ° min to max -1.0 ° |
-1.4 | -2.4 ° | |
| Info |
Battery Master On at 11:53:41 |
|||
| Info |
Engine 1 Started at 11:53:41 |
|||
| Info |
Engine 2 Started at 11:53:41 |
|||
| Info |
Beacon Lights Switched On at 11:53:41 |
|||
| Info |
Navigation Lights Switched On at 11:53:41 |
|||
| Info |
Strobe Lights Switched On at 11:53:41 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 11:53:45 |
Approaching runway 16R at LIRF Rome–Fiumicino Leonardo da Vinci International Airport from 3 nm to 2 nm. Descent from 1,328 ft agl to 949 ft agl. A decrease of 380 ft in 13 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 46.18 % |
Approach angle 4.9 ° 4.7 ° min to max 4.9 ° Target 3.0 ° |
4.9 | 4.7 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 168 kt 164 kt min to max 170 kt |
164 | 169 kt | |
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.2 ° -0.1 ° min to max 0.3 ° |
0.3 | -0.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.6 ° 0.1 ° min to max 1.6 ° |
1.6 | 0.6 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 0.99 g 0.94 g min to max 1.03 g |
1.00 | 1.00 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -1,602 fpm -1,796 fpm min to max -1,397 fpm |
-1,452 | -1,720 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 1,146 ft agl 949 ft agl min to max 1,328 ft agl |
1,328 | 949 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -3.0 ° -3.8 ° min to max -2.2 ° |
-2.4 | -2.8 ° | |
| Info |
GPWS Warning Activated at 11:57:07 |
Approaching runway 16R at LIRF Rome–Fiumicino Leonardo da Vinci International Airport from 2 nm to 1 nm. Descent from 921 ft agl to 535 ft agl. A decrease of 386 ft in 18 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 25.82 % |
Approach angle 4.7 ° 4.6 ° min to max 4.8 ° Target 3.0 ° |
4.7 | 4.8 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 164 kt 159 kt min to max 168 kt |
168 | 159 kt | |
| 100 % |
Heading variation -0.4 ° -0.5 ° min to max -0.2 ° |
-0.2 | -0.5 ° | |
| 99.81 % |
Average bank angle 1.5 ° 0.8 ° min to max 3.1 ° |
1.3 | 1.2 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.95 g min to max 1.08 g |
1.01 | 0.98 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -1,325 fpm -1,708 fpm min to max -1,131 fpm |
-1,708 | -1,137 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 716 ft agl 535 ft agl min to max 921 ft agl |
921 | 535 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -1.1 ° -2.7 ° min to max -0.2 ° |
-2.7 | -0.6 ° | |
| Info |
GPWS Warning Deactivated at 11:57:12 |
Approaching runway 16R at LIRF Rome–Fiumicino Leonardo da Vinci International Airport from 1 nm to 0 nm. Descent from 492 ft agl to 116 ft agl. A decrease of 376 ft in 18 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 25.46 % |
Approach angle 5.0 ° 4.8 ° min to max 5.6 ° Target 3.0 ° |
4.8 | 5.6 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 154 kt 147 kt min to max 158 kt |
158 | 147 kt | |
| 100 % |
Heading variation -0.1 ° -0.3 ° min to max 0.1 ° |
-0.3 | 0.1 ° | |
| 94.24 % |
Average bank angle 2.6 ° 0.3 ° min to max 5.6 ° |
2.5 | 0.3 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.02 g 0.96 g min to max 1.13 g |
0.98 | 1.06 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -1,268 fpm -1,449 fpm min to max -845 fpm |
-1,280 | -845 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 298 ft agl 116 ft agl min to max 492 ft agl |
492 | 116 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -0.5 ° -1.4 ° min to max 2.3 ° |
-1.0 | 2.3 ° |
Landing on runway 16R at LIRF Rome–Fiumicino Leonardo da Vinci International Airport, runway length 3,905 m. Threshold height at 96 ft agl was significantly above target. Threshold speed was good at 144 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Threshold speed was good at 144 kt. Target 140 kt |
|||
| 8.6 % |
Target 50 ft agl |
|||
| 0 % |
Landing and flare profile |
|||
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.1 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.2 ° |
0.2 | 0.0 ° | |
| 94.26 % |
Average bank angle 2.5 ° 0.1 ° min to max 4.6 ° |
2.8 | 4.6 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 0.96 g 0.93 g min to max 1.11 g |
1.02 | 1.11 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 142 kt 134 kt min to max 144 kt |
144 | 134 kt | |
| Info |
Average VSI -918 fpm -1,146 fpm min to max -708 fpm |
-740 | -1,144 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 49 ft agl 5 ft agl min to max 96 ft agl |
96 | 5 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 0.6 ° 0.2 ° min to max 1.8 ° |
1.8 | 1.5 ° |
Touchdown distance was good at 417 m. Touchdown speed at 134 kt was good. Touchdown rate was very heavy at -1,144 fpm. Runway touchdown alignment was very good. Local weather - Temperature 10 °C. Wind 3 kt at 75 °. Crosswind: 3 kt Headwind: 0 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 64.01 % |
Touchdown VSI was -1,144 fpm. |
|||
| 100 % |
Touchdown distance was 417 m Target 457 m |
|||
| 100 % |
Speed at touchdown 134 kt Target below 146 kt |
|||
| 100 % |
Runway alignment max 2.36 m 1.09 m left |
2.08 | -0.28 m | |
| 60.1 % |
Average bank angle 2.7 ° 0.1 ° min to max 5.5 ° |
4.6 | 0.8 ° | |
| 78 % |
Average g force 1.71 g 1.11 g min to max 2.27 g |
1.11 | 1.56 g | |
| 100 % |
Landing Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average speed 130 kt 127 kt min to max 134 kt |
134 | 127 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 0.3 ° -1.0 ° min to max 1.7 ° |
1.5 | 0.3 ° |
Total landing distance 916 m, 23 % of runway. Runway rollout alignment was excessively misaligned by 47.8 m from centreline.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Landing distance 916 m 23 % of runway. |
|||
| 0 % |
Runway alignment max 47.80 m 0.00 m left to 47.80 m right |
-0.66 | -39.94 m | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.06 g 0.93 g min to max 1.49 g |
1.49 | 1.00 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 117 kt 74 kt min to max 129 kt |
129 | 74 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 3.5 ° -1.3 ° min to max 8.3 ° |
0.5 | -1.1 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 1.1 ° 0.4 ° min to max 2.4 ° |
1.0 | 0.5 ° |
Exiting runway, average speed 40 kt
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| Info |
Average speed 37 kt 10 kt min to max 66 kt |
66 | 10 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -0.6 ° -1.0 ° min to max -0.5 ° |
-1.0 | -0.6 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.4 ° 0.1 ° min to max 0.6 ° |
0.1 | 0.4 ° | |
| Info |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.99 g min to max 1.00 g |
1.00 | 0.99 g |
The aircraft in question is an Airbus A330, which successfully landed at Rome–Fiumicino Leonardo da Vinci International Airport (LIRF) on runway 16R. The final approach was initiated from the north, heading 163.0° at a distance of 3 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,796 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft's performance during the landing was evaluated, and the results showed a satisfactory outcome in several aspects.
The threshold height at 96 feet agl was significantly above the target, indicating that the aircraft touched down slightly higher than intended. However, the threshold speed of 144 knots was within the acceptable range, demonstrating good control and management of the aircraft's descent. The touchdown distance of 417 meters was also considered good, indicating that the aircraft landed smoothly and within the desired parameters.
The touchdown speed of 134 knots was also within the acceptable range, and the touchdown rate of -1,144 feet per minute (fpm) was very heavy. This suggests that the aircraft touched down with a significant amount of force, which may have contributed to the runway rollout alignment issues that followed. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway centerline at the moment of touchdown.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were characterized by a temperature of 10°C and a wind speed of 3 knots from 75°. The crosswind component was 3 knots, while the headwind component was negligible. These conditions were relatively calm and did not pose a significant challenge to the landing.
The total landing distance of 916 meters was 23% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance considering the aircraft's size and weight. However, the runway rollout alignment was excessively misaligned by 47.8 meters from the centerline. This suggests that the aircraft may have experienced some difficulties in maintaining a stable and aligned path during the rollout phase, possibly due to the heavy touchdown rate and the aircraft's momentum.
Overall, the landing was considered satisfactory in many aspects, but the runway rollout alignment issues and the heavy touchdown rate are areas that require attention and improvement to ensure a smoother and more controlled landing.
Drag to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values
