Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Ease the nose up sooner to lift off at 135 kt instead of letting speed build on the ground.
What happened: The aircraft lifted off at 164 kt, 29 kt above the target liftoff speed.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator: 135 kt at liftoff
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Reduce power on final so the aircraft arrives at 124 kt over the threshold instead of carrying excess speed.
What happened: Crossing the threshold at 151 kt against a 124 kt target usually carries extra energy into the flare as a balloon, and the sink that returns afterward usually arrives hard at touchdown.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator: 124 kt at the threshold
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: seven checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
At the 500 ft gate: wings not level and speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,891 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,891 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 1,392 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking area to the runway, which took 20 minutes and covered a distance of 5 nautical miles. The aircraft, an Airbus A319, then departed from runway 08L at EDDM Munich Airport. The takeoff distance was 1,438 meters, which accounted for 36% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 164 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 15°C and a wind speed of 10 knots from a direction of 140°. The crosswind component was 8 knots, while the headwind component was 6 knots. With these conditions in mind, the aircraft began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile northeast of EDDM Munich Airport. The climb took the aircraft from an altitude of 2,490 feet above sea level to 17,883 feet above sea level, an increase of 15,393 feet in just 6 minutes, covering a distance of 19 nautical miles.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 1 mile southwest of Steinhoring and lasted for 2 minutes, covering a distance of 11 nautical miles. The enroute descent phase began 1 mile northeast of Bruckmuhl, where the aircraft descended from 17,889 feet above sea level to 3,220 feet above sea level, a decrease of 14,668 feet in 10 minutes, covering a distance of 43 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 26 at LOWI Innsbruck Airport was made from the east, with a heading of 262.0° at an altitude of 1,297 feet above ground level and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway. The landing was made on runway 26, which had a length of 1,891 meters. The threshold height was significantly above the target, while the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 132 knots.
The touchdown point was very long, using more than 50% of the available runway. The touchdown speed was 136 knots, which was fast, and the touchdown rate was firm at -329 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 10°C and a wind speed of 12 knots from a direction of 270°. The crosswind component was 2 knots, while the headwind component was 12 knots.
The total landing distance was 2,360 meters, which was 125% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good. The total flight distance was 84 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 43 minutes. The aircraft used 231 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A319 aircraft has successfully landed at Innsbruck Airport (LOWI) on runway 26. The final approach was initiated from the east, heading 262.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,297 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft's performance during the landing was evaluated, and it scored 63.5%.
The threshold height at 98 feet agl was significantly above the target, indicating that the aircraft was higher than expected when approaching the runway threshold. However, the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 132 knots, suggesting that the aircraft was maintaining a suitable speed for landing. The touchdown point was very long, utilizing more than 50% of the available runway, which may indicate that the aircraft was not fully optimized for the landing.
The touchdown speed of 136 knots was faster than expected, and the touchdown rate was firm at -329 feet per minute (fpm). This suggests that the aircraft touched down with a significant amount of force, which may have contributed to the long touchdown point. On the other hand, the runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating that the aircraft was aligned with the runway centerline at the moment of touchdown.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 10°C and a wind speed of 12 knots from 270°. The crosswind component was minimal at 2 knots, while the headwind component was 12 knots, which may have contributed to the aircraft's performance during the landing. The total landing distance was 2,360 meters, which is 125% of the runway length, indicating that the aircraft required a significant amount of runway to come to a stop.
The runway rollout alignment was very good, suggesting that the aircraft was well-controlled during the rollout phase. Overall, while the aircraft's performance during the landing was not optimal, it was still able to safely land on the runway.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values