Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 26 stages, 24 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,190 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 537 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, a landing score of 85.1% is a decent rating but there are definitely areas that can be improved upon for next time.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is noted that the descent path was above the glideslope limit. This may have contributed to the poor performance in this phase. Ensuring that the descent path is in line with the glideslope limit will help improve overall effectiveness.
Moving onto the Landing Phase, the threshold height being well above target and a very poor landing flare are key areas for focus. A proper flare is essential for a smooth touchdown and reducing the threshold height will improve the overall landing performance.
In the Touchdown Phase, it is positive to see that the touchdown rate was fair and the speed was on target. However, the touchdown point being 110 m beyond the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position being 5.0 m from the centerline are areas that can be improved upon. Ensuring a precise touchdown point and alignment with the centerline will enhance overall landing accuracy.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 6.2 m from the centerline is another area for improvement. Aligning the aircraft with the centerline during rollout will ensure a smooth taxi and landing exit.
Overall, it is important to take note of these areas for improvement and focus on practicing and fine-tuning these aspects for a more precise and efficient landing in the future. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in each phase of the landing process. With dedication and practice, improvements can be made to achieve even better landing scores in the future.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values