Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 22 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,718 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,718 m of the 2,688 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 650 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, your aircraft landing score of 86.5% is a commendable achievement, but there are certainly areas where improvements can be made to reach an even higher score. Let's break down the different phases of the landing process and discuss how each phase can be improved.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is noted that the descent path was above the glideslope limit. To improve this, pilots should pay close attention to vertical speed and adjust descent rate accordingly to stay within the glideslope limits. Maintaining a stable descent path ensures a smoother approach and sets the stage for a successful landing.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, there were a few areas of concern. The threshold height being well above target suggests that the approach angle may have been too steep. Pilots should aim to keep the aircraft on a stable descent profile to achieve the desired threshold height. Additionally, the poor landing flare indicates a lack of proper flare technique. Pilots should practice and hone their flare skills to ensure a smooth touchdown.
In the Touchdown Phase, while the touchdown rate was noted to be hard, the speed was on target. To improve the touchdown phase, pilots should focus on achieving a smooth and controlled touchdown to minimize wear and tear on the aircraft. Also, the touchdown point being 234 m beyond the touchdown zone indicates a long landing. Pilots should aim to touch down within the designated touchdown zone for optimal landing performance.
During the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 8.6 m from the centerline suggests the need for improved runway tracking. Pilots should work on maintaining proper alignment during rollout to ensure a safe and efficient taxi to the terminal.
In conclusion, while your aircraft landing score of 86.5% is respectable, there is always room for improvement. By focusing on areas such as descent path, flare technique, touchdown precision, and runway tracking, you can elevate your landing performance to even greater heights. Keep practicing, stay vigilant, and strive for excellence in every landing you make. You have the potential to achieve even greater success in your future landings. Keep up the good work!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values