Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,712 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 515 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight in the Cessna Longitude started with a 6-minute taxi from the parking area to the runway at Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas. The departure roll from runway 01R covered 803 meters, which was 31% of the total runway length. The liftoff speed was 132 knots, with a temperature of 19°C and no significant wind.
The enroute climb began over Paradise, Nevada, with the aircraft climbing from 3,176 feet above sea level to 28,386 feet, covering 38 nautical miles in 10 minutes. The level cruise portion of the flight started 15 miles northwest of Hart Mine Airport in Ivanpah, California, lasting 11 minutes and covering 82 nautical miles.
The descent phase commenced 7 miles east of Bakersfield, California, with the aircraft descending from 28,415 feet to 12,636 feet in 9 minutes, covering 55 nautical miles. Another brief level cruise segment began 2 miles southwest of Fontana, California, lasting 2 minutes and covering 11 nautical miles.
The final descent began 1 mile north of Chino, California, with the aircraft descending from 12,126 feet to 1,407 feet in 7 minutes, covering 32 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 24R at Los Angeles International Airport from the east was at a heading of 263.0°, 4 nautical miles out, and at 1,273 feet above ground level.
The landing on runway 24R at LAX was successful, with the touchdown point 87 meters beyond the designated zone. The touchdown speed of 114 knots was slightly fast, but the touchdown rate was fair at -244 feet per minute. Total landing distance was 1,118 meters, which was 41% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good.
After landing, the taxi from the runway to the parking area took less than 1 minute, covering less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 225 nautical miles, with a total flight time of 47 minutes. The aircraft used 897 kilograms of fuel for the entire journey.
First and foremost, congratulations on achieving a high aircraft landing score of 97.0%! This is a commendable achievement and reflects a strong proficiency in the art of landing an aircraft.
Let's delve into the detailed analysis of the different phases of the landing process. Starting with the Approach Phase, it is worth noting that the glideslope alignment was excellent. This indicates a precise and smooth descent towards the runway, ensuring a safe and controlled approach. Additionally, having a threshold speed well above target at 134 knots suggests good control over the aircraft's velocity, enhancing the overall safety of the landing.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is commendable that the threshold height was good, indicating a well-timed descent towards the runway. The great landing flare further enhances the smoothness of the touchdown, reducing the chances of a hard landing or bounce.
However, in the Touchdown Phase, there are a few areas that could be improved. While the touchdown rate of -244 feet per minute is fair, there is room for refinement to achieve a smoother touchdown. Additionally, the touchdown speed of 114 knots is slightly fast, which could be addressed by adjusting the approach speed to ensure a safer and more controlled landing. The touchdown point being 87 meters beyond the touchdown zone is something to take note of, as it indicates the need for a more precise approach to ensure landing within the designated area. Nonetheless, the runway touchdown alignment being very good showcases a strong understanding of aligning the aircraft with the runaway for a safe landing.
Overall, your performance in the aircraft landing demonstrates a high level of skill and proficiency. By focusing on fine-tuning certain aspects such as touchdown speed and achieving a more precise touchdown within the designated zone, you can further enhance your landing capabilities. Keep up the excellent work and continue striving for improvement in all phases of the landing process. Your dedication to excellence is evident, and I have no doubt that with continued practice and attention to detail, you will achieve even higher scores in the future. Well done!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values