Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 22 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,034 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 622 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, your aircraft landing score of 85.2% shows that there were areas that need improvement, but also highlights some strengths in your landing execution.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is important to note that maintaining a proper descent path above the glideslope limit is crucial for a smooth landing. Additionally, ensuring that your speed is on target during this phase will help set you up for success as you transition into the landing phase.
Moving onto the Landing Phase, it is clear that there were some areas where improvement is needed. The fact that the threshold height was above target and the landing flare was very poor suggests a need for better control and coordination during the final moments before touchdown.
In the Touchdown Phase, while it is positive that your speed was on target, the hard touchdown rate and touchdown point being 192 m beyond the touchdown zone indicate a need for better precision and planning in your approach. Additionally, landing with a 16 kn tailwind could have contributed to the challenges experienced during this phase.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, maintaining proper runway alignment is crucial for a safe and controlled landing. The fact that the runway alignment was 10.3 m from the centerline further emphasizes the need for improved alignment and control during this phase.
Overall, while there were some areas that need improvement, it is important to remember that every landing is a learning opportunity. By paying close attention to the specific areas identified for improvement and practicing techniques to enhance your landing skills, you will be able to elevate your performance and improve your overall landing score in future flights. Keep up the hard work and dedication to improving, and you will undoubtedly see progress in your aircraft landing skills.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values