Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 34 stages, 33 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,733 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,733 m of the 1,771 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 572 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Okay, let's break down the landing score of 69.0% and identify areas for improvement while maintaining an encouraging tone.
Firstly, the Approach Phase showed a poor descent path above the glideslope limit. This indicates a need for better precision in maintaining the correct descent angle towards the runway. Focus on adjusting the descent rate to stay on the glideslope for smoother landings.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, the threshold height was well above target, suggesting the need for a more precise approach to reach the desired touchdown point. Additionally, the landing flare was very poor, indicating the need for better control and timing to ensure a smoother touchdown.
Despite these challenges, the Touchdown Phase showed some positive aspects. The touchdown rate was excellent, showcasing good control and precision. However, there is room for improvement as the speed was slightly above target and the touchdown point was 137 m beyond the designated touchdown zone. Focus on adjusting speed and aiming for the correct touchdown point to improve accuracy.
Furthermore, it's important to note that landing with a 10 kn tailwind can introduce additional challenges and may have impacted the overall landing performance. Be cautious of environmental factors and adjust your approach accordingly to ensure safe landings.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was 21.2 m from the centreline. This suggests the need for better alignment during the rollout phase to ensure a smooth transition from landing to taxiing.
Overall, while there were some challenges in various phases of the landing, there were also positive aspects to build on. Focus on improving descent path, touchdown precision, and alignment to enhance your landing performance. Keep practicing and adjusting your techniques to achieve smoother and more precise landings. With determination and dedication, you can continue to improve and achieve higher landing scores. Keep up the good work and keep striving for excellence in every landing!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values