Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,200 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 554 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft, an Airbus A321, taxiing from the parking area to the runway at Munich Airport, EDDM. This process took 6 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The departure roll took place on runway 26L, with the aircraft lifting off after a takeoff distance of 1,296 meters, which was 33% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 164 knots.
As the aircraft climbed to its cruising altitude, it encountered local weather conditions of 6°C temperature and a wind speed of 2 knots at 330 degrees. The crosswind component was 2 knots, while the headwind component was 1 knot. The enroute climb started overhead Hallbergmoos in Bavaria, Germany, and took the aircraft from an altitude of 2,493 feet above sea level to 37,340 feet above sea level, an increase of 34,847 feet in 22 minutes, covering a distance of 146 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise began 2 miles east of Frankenfels in Niederoesterreich, Austria, and lasted for 25 minutes, covering a distance of 198 nautical miles. The descent started 2 miles east of Kal in Heves megye, Hungary, and took the aircraft from an altitude of 37,268 feet above sea level to 1,624 feet above sea level, a decrease of 35,644 feet in 21 minutes, covering a distance of 57 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 22L at Debrecen International Airport, LHDC, was made from the north-east, heading 229.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,256 feet above ground level. The landing took place on runway 22L, which had a length of 2,200 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was also good at 136 knots. The touchdown point was 137 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 126 knots and a smooth touchdown rate of -128 feet per minute.
The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 14.2 meters from the centreline, and the runway rollout alignment was also slightly misaligned by 14.2 meters from the centreline. The total landing distance was 1,211 meters, which was 55% of the runway length. The taxiing to the parking area from the runway took 3 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 409 nautical miles, taking 79 minutes, and the aircraft used 3,564 kilograms of fuel.
The Airbus A321 aircraft successfully landed at Debrecen International Airport (LHDC) on runway 22L, achieving a score of 92.4%. The final approach was initiated from the north-east, heading 229.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,256 feet above ground level (agl).
The aircraft touched down on the runway with a good threshold height and a threshold speed of 136 knots, which is within the acceptable range. The touchdown point was located 137 meters beyond the touchdown zone, indicating a slight overrun. However, the touchdown speed of 126 knots was considered good, and the touchdown rate of -128 feet per minute (fpm) was smooth, indicating a controlled descent.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 11°C and a wind speed of 3 knots from 200°. The crosswind component was minimal at 1 knot, while the headwind component was 2 knots. These conditions contributed to a relatively smooth landing.
The total landing distance of 1,211 meters was 55% of the runway length, which is within the acceptable range. However, the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 14.2 meters from the centerline, and the runway rollout alignment was also slightly misaligned by the same distance. These minor deviations from the centerline may have been due to factors such as wind or pilot error.
Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft touching down safely and the pilot maintaining control throughout the rollout. While there were some minor deviations from the ideal landing, the score of 92.4% indicates a high level of proficiency and adherence to standard operating procedures.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values