Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,881 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,881 m of the 3,357 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 858 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, achieving a landing score of 90.7% is a commendable achievement. Let's break down the analysis of each phase of the landing to further improve the score and make it even more exceptional.
The Approach Phase was off to a great start with good glideslope alignment, indicating a well-controlled descent towards the runway. This shows excellent precision and skill in maintaining the correct angle for a smooth transition into the Landing Phase.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, while the threshold height was slightly above target, the area that requires improvement is the landing flare. A very poor landing flare can result in a harder touchdown and potentially unsafe landing conditions. Practicing and mastering the correct technique for the landing flare will greatly enhance the overall landing performance.
In the Touchdown Phase, it's laudable that the touchdown rate was smooth and the speed was on target. However, landing 441 meters beyond the touchdown zone indicates room for improvement in judging the touchdown point. Ensuring that the touchdown is precisely within the designated zone will contribute to a higher landing score. Despite this, the runway touchdown position was rated as very good, showcasing excellent control and alignment during this phase.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, maintaining runway alignment is crucial for a safe and efficient landing. The fact that the runway alignment was rated as very good reflects your skill in controlling the aircraft during the rollout phase, leading to a successful completion of the landing.
In conclusion, while your overall landing score of 90.7% is impressive, there are specific areas where focus and practice can further enhance your performance. By refining the landing flare technique, improving judgment of the touchdown point, and ensuring precise alignment throughout all phases of the landing, you have the opportunity to achieve even higher scores in the future. Keep up the great work and continue striving for excellence in every aspect of your aircraft landings.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values