Departing from the vicinity of Dinner Plain in the State of Victoria, Australia, the DA62 began its enroute climb, ascending from an initial altitude of 6,477 feet above sea level to 4,603 feet above sea level, a vertical gain of 1,874 feet in just 3 minutes. This climb phase covered a horizontal distance of 5 nautical miles, demonstrating the aircraft's efficient climb performance. The climb was initiated 3 miles northeast of Dinner Plain, setting the stage for the subsequent phases of the flight.
As the DA62 approached Mount Hotham Airport, it began its final approach to runway 11 from the northwestern direction, maintaining a heading of 125.0 degrees at an altitude of 341 feet above ground level and a distance of 1 nautical mile from the runway threshold. The aircraft's approach speed and configuration were well-managed, with a threshold speed of 82 knots and a touchdown speed of 72 knots, both of which were within acceptable limits. The landing distance of 308 meters was also satisfactory, with the aircraft touching down at the correct point on the runway.
The DA62 landed safely on runway 11, which has a length of 1,457 meters. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 15 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 15 knots from 228 degrees. The crosswind component was 14 knots, while the tailwind component was 4 knots. The aircraft's touchdown rate of -291 feet per minute was slightly below the optimal range, but the runway touchdown alignment was perfect. The total landing distance of 535 meters, which accounted for 37% of the runway length, was reasonable. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, indicating a smooth and controlled deceleration after touchdown. The flight, which covered a total distance of 5 nautical miles, consumed approximately 1 kilogram of fuel and lasted for 3 minutes.
Replay this flight in 3D — the full flight path over the terrain with every stage, event and score along the route.
Enroute climb started 3 miles north east of Dinner Plain (State of Victoria, Australia). Climbing from 6,477 ft asl to 4,603 ft asl, an increase of 1,874 ft in 3 minutes and covering 5 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 103 kt 81 kt min to max 119 kt |
115 | 82 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 4.6 ° 0.0 ° min to max 23.4 ° |
1.3 | 8.2 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.55 g min to max 1.45 g |
1.08 | 1.14 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -707 fpm -2,569 fpm min to max 239 fpm |
-675 | -1,232 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 5,727 ft asl 4,603 ft asl min to max 6,500 ft asl |
6,477 | 4,603 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -0.3 ° -4.7 ° min to max 4.7 ° |
1.1 | -0.1 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Battery Master On at 11:58:47 |
|||
| Info |
Engine 1 Started at 11:58:47 |
|||
| Info |
Engine 2 Started at 11:58:47 |
|||
| Info |
Beacon Lights Switched On at 11:58:47 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Lights Switched On at 11:58:47 |
|||
| Info |
Navigation Lights Switched On at 11:58:47 |
|||
| Info |
Strobe Lights Switched On at 11:58:47 |
|||
| Info |
Autopilot Master Switched On at 11:58:47 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Gear Activated at 11:58:47 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Gear Down at 11:58:47 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 11:58:47 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Fully Retracted at 11:59:49 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 12:00:53 |
Approaching runway 11 at YHOT Mount Hotham Airport from 1 nm to 0 nm. Descent from 341 ft agl to 70 ft agl. A decrease of 271 ft in 22 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 98 % |
Approach angle 3.1 ° 2.2 ° min to max 4.0 ° Target 3.0 ° |
4.0 | 3.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 82 kt 80 kt min to max 93 kt |
82 | 82 kt | |
| 58.4 % |
Heading variation -0.5 ° -1.5 ° min to max 1.2 ° |
0.8 | -0.3 ° | |
| 46.64 % |
Average bank angle 6.1 ° 0.2 ° min to max 23.8 ° |
13.5 | 8.4 ° | |
| 99.43 % |
Average g force 1.06 g 0.67 g min to max 1.52 g |
1.23 | 1.05 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -703 fpm -1,635 fpm min to max 260 fpm |
-1,197 | -618 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 112 ft agl 70 ft agl min to max 341 ft agl |
341 | 70 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 2.3 ° -0.9 ° min to max 12.2 ° |
2.5 | 2.0 ° | |
| Info |
Stall Warning Activated at 12:01:44 |
|||
| Info |
Stall Warning Deactivated at 12:01:45 |
Landing on runway 11 at YHOT Mount Hotham Airport, runway length 1,457 m. Good threshold height. Threshold speed was good at 82 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Threshold speed was good at 82 kt. Target 83 kt |
|||
| 100 % |
Target 50 ft agl |
|||
| 94.56 % |
Landing and flare profile |
|||
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.1 ° -0.3 ° min to max 0.2 ° |
-0.3 | 0.0 ° | |
| 76.37 % |
Average bank angle 8.2 ° 0.3 ° min to max 12.1 ° |
8.7 | 1.5 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.04 g 0.92 g min to max 1.15 g |
1.04 | 1.03 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 78 kt 72 kt min to max 82 kt |
82 | 72 kt | |
| Info |
Average VSI -428 fpm -615 fpm min to max -249 fpm |
-615 | -291 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 4 ft agl -16 ft agl min to max 33 ft agl |
33 | -16 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 3.4 ° 1.6 ° min to max 5.3 ° |
1.9 | 5.3 ° |
Touchdown distance was good at 308 m. Touchdown speed at 72 kt was good. Touchdown rate was fair at -291 fpm. Runway touchdown alignment was perfect. Local weather - Temperature 15 °C. Wind 15 kt at 228 °. Crosswind: 14 kt Tailwind: 4 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 93.42 % |
Touchdown VSI was -291 fpm. |
|||
| 100 % |
Touchdown distance was 308 m Target 457 m |
|||
| 100 % |
Speed at touchdown 72 kt Target below 76 kt |
|||
| 100 % |
Runway alignment max 0.98 m 0.53 m right |
-0.07 | -0.98 m | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.4 ° 0.0 ° min to max 1.5 ° |
1.5 | 0.3 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.14 g 1.03 g min to max 1.26 g |
1.03 | 1.06 g | |
| 100 % |
Landing Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average speed 72 kt 72 kt min to max 72 kt |
72 | 72 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 3.9 ° 2.4 ° min to max 5.3 ° |
5.3 | 2.4 ° |
Total landing distance 535 m, 37 % of runway. Runway rollout alignment was very good.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Landing distance 535 m 37 % of runway. |
|||
| 91.9 % |
Runway alignment max 5.27 m 0.00 m left to 5.27 m right |
-1.09 | -1.07 m | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.96 g min to max 1.06 g |
1.06 | 0.99 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 76 kt 48 kt min to max 81 kt |
81 | 48 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -0.5 ° -2.1 ° min to max 2.3 ° |
2.3 | -1.8 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.5 ° 0.0 ° min to max 1.0 ° |
0.4 | 0.3 ° |
Exiting runway, average speed 21 kt
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| Info |
Average speed 25 kt 13 kt min to max 40 kt |
40 | 13 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -1.5 ° -1.8 ° min to max -1.1 ° |
-1.7 | -1.1 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.2 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.4 ° |
0.4 | 0.0 ° | |
| Info |
Average g force 0.99 g 0.98 g min to max 1.00 g |
1.00 | 0.99 g |
The final approach to runway 11 at YHOT Mount Hotham Airport from the north west was executed with precision, with the aircraft maintaining a heading of 125.0° at 1 nm and 341 ft above ground level. The approach quality was excellent, with a good threshold height and a threshold speed of 82 kt, well within the acceptable range. The aircraft touched down smoothly at a speed of 72 kt, with a touchdown distance of 308 m, which was within the expected parameters.
The touchdown characteristics were good, with a relatively low touchdown rate of -291 fpm, although this was slightly below the ideal rate. However, the runway touchdown alignment was perfect, with the aircraft centered on the runway. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 15 °C and a wind of 15 kt at 228°, presented a moderate crosswind component of 14 kt, but the tailwind component of 4 kt was minimal. The aircraft's performance was not significantly affected by the wind conditions.
The rollout phase was executed with great skill, with the aircraft maintaining a very good alignment on the runway. The total landing distance of 535 m was 37% of the runway length, which was within the acceptable range. Overall, the landing was scored 92.9%, reflecting the high level of proficiency demonstrated by the pilot. The landing was a testament to the aircraft's capabilities and the pilot's expertise in executing a safe and efficient landing in challenging weather conditions.
Drag to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values