Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 5.3 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Keep the back pressure coming once the flare is established, holding the attitude instead of letting the nose drop.
What happened: Sink came back after the flare had arrested it, and that pattern usually carries the touchdown long - here it landed at 749 m against the 457 m aim point.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: a steady, shallow rate through the flare with no renewed sink before touchdown
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: sink rate 1,473 fpm, more than the glideslope needed and centreline 1.7° off, against a 1° limit.
At the 500 ft gate: speed 7 kt SLOW on the reference speed of 124 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,530 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,530 m of the 2,961 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 749 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight departed from MMTJ Aeropuerto Internacional Gral. Abelardo Rodriguez in Tijuana, Mexico, with a taxiing time of less than 1 minute to reach the runway. The departure roll on runway 09 was initiated, and the aircraft lifted off after a takeoff distance of 1,225 meters, which accounted for 41% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 159 knots, and the local weather conditions were characterized by a temperature of 22°C and a gentle wind of 3 knots from 224°.
As the aircraft climbed to 5,671 feet above sea level, it traversed a distance of 9 nautical miles in 2 minutes, achieving an increase of 4,252 feet. The enroute climb and descent phases were interspersed with various altitudinal adjustments, with the aircraft reaching a maximum altitude of 28,993 feet above sea level. The final approach to runway 09 was initiated from the west, with a heading of 107.0° at 3 nautical miles and 1,388 feet above ground level. The landing was executed with a threshold speed slightly below the target at 115 knots, and the touchdown point was 327 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was 102 knots, and the touchdown rate was -168 feet per minute, both of which were considered good.
The total landing distance was 1,444 meters, accounting for 49% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good, and the taxiing time to the parking area was 4 minutes, covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 128 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 31 minutes, with no fuel consumption reported. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 20°C and a gentle wind of 3 knots from 223°.
The final approach to runway 09 at MMTJ Aeropuerto Internacional Gral. Abelardo Rodriguez from the west was executed with good quality, with the aircraft maintaining a steady heading of 107.0° at 3 nm and 1,388 ft above ground level. The approach was conducted in a temperature of 20 °C, with a gentle wind of 3 kt at 223°, resulting in a minimal crosswind component of 2 kt and a slight tailwind of 2 kt.
As the aircraft touched down on the runway, the threshold speed was a little below the target at 115 kt, but the touchdown speed of 102 kt was well within the acceptable range. The touchdown rate of -168 fpm was also good, indicating a controlled descent. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.1 m from the centreline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the approach path. The touchdown point was 327 m beyond the touchdown zone, which is a reasonable distance considering the runway length of 2,961 m.
The rollout phase was executed smoothly, with the aircraft maintaining very good alignment with the centreline. The total landing distance of 1,444 m, which accounts for 49% of the runway, was reasonable given the conditions. Overall, the landing was executed with a high degree of proficiency, resulting in a score of 92.4%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values