Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 8.1 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: wings not level and speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,736 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 173 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 4 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-600, then departed from runway 24 at CYTR CFB Trenton, with a takeoff distance of 985 meters, which was 36% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 146 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 14°C, with a wind speed of 1 knot at 199°. The crosswind and headwind components were both 1 knot. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile southwest of CYTR CFB Trenton, and climbed from an altitude of 1,270 feet above sea level to 38,156 feet above sea level, an increase of 36,886 feet, in 40 minutes and covering a distance of 269 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise started 8 miles north of Omer, Michigan, and lasted for 149 minutes, covering a distance of 1,167 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 3 miles northwest of Wilson, Wyoming, and descended from 37,547 feet above sea level to 5,993 feet above sea level, a decrease of 31,554 feet, in 9 minutes and covering a distance of 48 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 21 at KIDA Idaho Falls Regional Airport was made from the northeast, with a heading of 219.0°, at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,233 feet above ground level. The landing was made on runway 21, which had a length of 2,736 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was slightly below the target at 118 knots.
The touchdown distance was good at 172 meters, and the touchdown speed was 114 knots, which was good. However, the touchdown rate was fair at -226 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.5 meters from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 19°C, with a wind speed of 5 knots at 210°. The crosswind and headwind components were 1 and 5 knots, respectively.
The total landing distance was 606 meters, which was 22% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 1 minute and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 1,491 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 205 minutes. The aircraft used 9,488 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-600 aircraft successfully landed at KIDA Idaho Falls Regional Airport, achieving a score of 99.7%. The final approach to runway 21 was initiated from the north east, with a heading of 219.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,233 feet above ground level.
The aircraft touched down on the runway with a speed of 114 kt, which was slightly below the target threshold speed of 118 kt. However, the touchdown distance of 172 meters was considered good, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. The touchdown rate of -226 feet per minute was fair, suggesting a slight deviation from the ideal rate.
Upon landing, the aircraft's runway touchdown position was found to be slightly misaligned by 3.5 meters from the centerline. This minor deviation may have been due to the crosswind or headwind conditions present during the landing. The local weather conditions at the time of landing included a temperature of 19°C, with a wind speed of 5 kt at 210°. The crosswind component was minimal at 1 kt, while the headwind component was 5 kt.
The total landing distance of 606 meters was 22% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing distance. This is a testament to the aircraft's performance and the pilot's skill in executing a controlled landing. The runway rollout alignment was very good, suggesting that the aircraft was well under control during the post-landing phase.
Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft achieving a high score of 99.7%. The minor deviations in touchdown speed and position were offset by the good touchdown distance and rollout alignment, making this a well-executed landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values