Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Shorten the long landing
Ground effect becomes significant below about one wingspan of height. A Cessna 172, with a 36 ft span, enters ground effect at flare height - the float it feels in the hold-off is ground effect arriving on cue. An A320, with a span around 117 ft, has been in ground effect since before the threshold and there is no sudden cushion to feel, only a gradual reduction in induced drag that lengthens any float you allow.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,524 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 731 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight in the M500 began with a 7-minute taxi from the parking area to the runway at Vero Beach Regional Airport. The departure roll on runway 30L covered 768 meters (35% of the runway) before liftoff at a speed of 102 knots. The local weather at the time of departure was 22°C with a 16 knot wind coming from 340°, resulting in a crosswind of 12 knots and a headwind of 10 knots.
The enroute climb started 2 miles west of Gifford, climbing from 1,048 feet above sea level to 3,339 feet above sea level in 3 minutes and covering 5 nautical miles. The level cruise portion of the flight began 1 mile west of New Hibiscus Airpark Vero Beach and lasted 28 minutes, covering 79 nautical miles.
The enroute descent started overhead Highland Beach, descending from 2,668 feet above sea level to 2,010 feet above sea level in 2 minutes and covering 6 nautical miles. The next level cruise segment started 1 mile north of Tedder and lasted 10 minutes, covering 28 nautical miles.
The second descent of the flight started 2 miles southwest of Opa Locka West Miami, descending from 1,657 feet above sea level to 932 feet above sea level in 2 minutes and covering 5 nautical miles. The final approach to landing at Miami-Opa Locka Executive Airport took the aircraft from 1 nautical mile at 919 feet above ground level to touchdown. The touchdown was recorded with a speed of 96 knots, a smooth touchdown rate of -139 feet per minute, and a touchdown point 304 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The landing rollout covered a distance of 741 meters at an altitude of 0 feet above sea level.
The taxi from the runway to the parking area took 5 minutes, completing the flight with a total distance of 131 nautical miles in 54 minutes and using 112 kg of fuel.
Overall, your aircraft landing score of 53.6% indicates that there were both strengths and areas for improvement during the landing process.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is noted that there were issues with the descent path being above the glideslope limit and poor heading alignment. These factors can affect the overall stability and accuracy of the landing process. Additionally, the excessively high threshold speed of 117 knots can impact the smoothness of the touchdown.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is positive to see that the threshold height was good. However, there were concerns regarding the landing flare and bank angle stability during landing. These aspects are crucial for a smooth and safe touchdown.
In the Touchdown Phase, it is commendable that the touchdown rate was smooth at -139 ft/m. However, the touchdown speed of 96 knots was noted to be too fast and the touchdown point was significantly beyond the designated touchdown zone. Furthermore, the runway touchdown position was excessively misaligned from the centerline.
On a positive note, navigating a 14 knot crosswind during landing is no easy feat and it is noteworthy that you were able to manage this aspect effectively. Crosswind landings require skill and precision, so well done on handling this challenging condition.
In conclusion, while there were some areas that require improvement in terms of descent path, heading alignment, speed control, touchdown point accuracy, and alignment with centerline during landing, there were also strengths such as managing a crosswind landing effectively and achieving a smooth touchdown rate. By focusing on these areas for improvement and building on your strengths, you can work towards achieving a higher landing score in future flights. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in your landings.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values