Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Apply small rudder corrections against a point at the far end of the runway to hold the centreline during the roll.
What happened: The aircraft tracked 17 m off the runway centreline during the ground roll, and flights with this pattern usually carry extra bank, around 15°, into the first climb.
Watch for: Heading indicator: wings level, tracking the runway centreline
Arrival
Reduce power earlier on the approach to bring the speed back to 65 kt before the stabilisation gate.
What happened: Carrying excess speed through the stabilisation gate usually rides all the way down to the runway, and this flight touched down at 121 kt, 57 kt above the 64 kt target.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator against 65 kt on approach and against 64 kt at touchdown.
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 11 stages, 9 scored
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: seven checks where the approach path is 300 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out. These checks are the approach's score.
At the 300 ft gate: no landing flap set, glideslope 5.2° against the runway's 3°, centreline 7.6° off, against a 1° limit and speed 49 kt FAST on the reference speed of 65 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,864 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 241 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone.
The rest of the report
Taxiing from the parking area to the runway at EGCB City Airport Manchester took less than a minute, covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then began its departure roll on runway 26R, accelerating to a liftoff speed of 50 knots. The takeoff distance of 367 meters accounted for 57% of the available runway length. Local weather conditions at the time of departure featured a temperature of 20°C, with a wind of 10 knots at 298°, resulting in a crosswind of 6 knots and a headwind of 8 knots.
As the aircraft climbed away from EGCB City Airport Manchester, it transitioned into an enroute climb phase, reaching an altitude of 1,264 feet above sea level. This increase of 190 feet over a distance of 2 nautical miles was achieved in just 1 minute. The enroute level cruise phase commenced overhead Irlam, lasting 10 minutes and covering a distance of 21 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final approach to runway 23L at EGCC Manchester Airport, descending from an altitude of 238 feet above ground level.
The landing on runway 23L was notable for its touchdown distance of 226 meters, which was within acceptable limits. However, the touchdown speed of 121 knots was excessively high, and the touchdown rate of -2,487 feet per minute was very heavy. Additionally, the runway touchdown position was excessively misaligned by 146.5 meters from the centreline. The total landing distance of 519 meters accounted for 18% of the available runway length, and the runway rollout alignment was also excessively misaligned by 153.2 meters from the centreline. The total flight distance of 23 nautical miles was achieved in 12 minutes, with a fuel consumption of 8 kilograms.
The final approach to runway 23L at EGCC Manchester Airport from the north east was initiated at 0 nm and 238 ft above ground level, heading 249.0°. The approach quality was compromised by an excessively high threshold height of 174 ft agl, exceeding the target by a significant margin. This deviation from standard operating procedures likely contributed to the subsequent issues encountered during the landing phase.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft exhibited a number of concerning characteristics. The touchdown speed of 121 kt was excessively fast, and the touchdown rate of -2,487 fpm was classified as very heavy. The touchdown distance of 226 m was satisfactory, but the runway touchdown position was excessively misaligned by 146.5 m from the centreline. This misalignment was further exacerbated during the rollout phase, where the aircraft remained 153.2 m off-centreline. The threshold speed of 117 kt was also excessively high, indicating a potential loss of control during the approach.
The overall performance of the landing was disappointing, with a score of 47.7%. The excessive threshold height, high threshold speed, and heavy touchdown rate all contributed to a suboptimal landing. The touchdown speed and distance were the only aspects of the landing that met acceptable standards. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 22 °C and wind speeds of 12 kt at 280°, did not appear to significantly impact the landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values