Track every flight, analyse your performance,
and master your flying skills with My FS Flights
Get 10 flights free every month!
Tracked and analysed flights over miles
The flight began with a departure roll from runway 28 at N94 Carlisle, a small airfield. The Cessna 152 aircraft accelerated down the runway, covering a distance of 122 meters, which was 10% of the runway's length. The liftoff speed was achieved at 56 knots, marking the start of the climb.
As the aircraft entered the local area, the pilot encountered a relatively calm environment, with a temperature of 15 degrees Celsius and a gentle wind blowing at 1 knot from a direction of 269 degrees. This resulted in a negligible crosswind component and a slight headwind, which would have a minimal impact on the flight.
The pilot then initiated a left-hand pattern entry from runway 28, navigating the aircraft through a series of turns and legs. The entry into the pattern was swift, with the aircraft covering less than 1 nautical mile in just 18 seconds. The subsequent crosswind turn was completed in 25 seconds, demonstrating the pilot's proficiency in handling the aircraft in various wind conditions.
As the aircraft progressed through the pattern, it completed a downwind turn, covering a distance of 1 nautical mile and establishing an angle of 62.3 degrees to the runway. The downwind leg itself was 2 nautical miles long, taking 79 seconds to complete. The base leg turn was another 2 nautical miles, with the aircraft establishing an angle of 50.2 degrees to the runway. The base leg itself was 1 nautical mile long, taking 62 seconds to complete.
The final turn into the runway was quick, with the aircraft covering less than 1 nautical mile in just 38 seconds. The pilot then lined up the aircraft for a final approach to runway 28, flying at a heading of 278.0 degrees and an altitude of 559 feet above ground level.
The landing itself was smooth, with the aircraft touching down on the runway at a speed of 41 knots. The touchdown distance was good, covering 126 meters, and the touchdown rate was perfect, at -14 feet per minute. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned, being 3.7 meters off the centerline.
The flight was completed with a total distance of 7 nautical miles, taking 6 minutes to cover. The aircraft used a relatively small amount of fuel, just 1 kilogram, indicating efficient flight planning and execution.
Replay this flight in 3D — the full flight path over the terrain with every stage, event and score along the route.
Departure roll runway 28 at N94 Carlisle. Takeoff distance 122 m 10 % of runway. Liftoff speed was 56 kt. Local weather - Temperature 15 °C. Wind 1 kt at 269 °. Crosswind: 0 kt Headwind: 1 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Takeoff distance 122 m 10 % of runway |
|||
| 100 % |
Liftoff speed was 56 kt Target 56 kt |
|||
| 100 % |
Runway alignment max 1.34 m 0.00 m left to 1.34 m right |
-1.26 | -0.67 m | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.99 g min to max 1.12 g |
1.00 | 1.12 g | |
| 100 % |
Takeoff Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.6 ° 0.4 ° min to max 5.6 ° |
0.4 | 5.6 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.2 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.4 ° |
0.0 | 0.1 ° | |
| Info |
Battery Master On at 10:59:13 |
|||
| Info |
Engine 1 Started at 10:59:13 |
|||
| Info |
Beacon Lights Switched On at 10:59:13 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Lights Switched On at 10:59:13 |
|||
| Info |
Navigation Lights Switched On at 10:59:13 |
|||
| Info |
Strobe Lights Switched On at 10:59:13 |
Departure climb to 50 ft agl from runway 28 N94 Carlisle.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Heading variation -0.0 ° -0.1 ° min to max 0.1 ° |
0.1 | -0.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 66 kt 57 kt min to max 74 kt |
57 | 74 kt | |
| 98.16 % |
Average bank angle 1.0 ° 0.0 ° min to max 2.7 ° |
0.2 | 0.7 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.94 g min to max 1.12 g |
1.12 | 0.99 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 332 fpm 287 fpm min to max 382 fpm |
313 | 317 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 27 ft agl 1 ft agl min to max 52 ft agl |
1 | 52 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 5.4 ° 4.4 ° min to max 6.7 ° |
5.6 | 4.4 ° |
Departure climb to 400 ft agl from 28 N94 Carlisle.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 77 kt 73 kt min to max 79 kt |
74 | 75 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.8 ° 0.0 ° min to max 3.6 ° |
0.6 | 3.6 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.03 g 0.94 g min to max 1.11 g |
0.99 | 1.00 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 531 fpm 314 fpm min to max 1,104 fpm |
316 | 753 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 109 ft agl 53 ft agl min to max 413 ft agl |
53 | 413 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 6.2 ° 4.3 ° min to max 10.2 ° |
4.4 | 7.0 ° |
Left hand pattern entry from runway 28 N94 Carlisle. Distance was less than 1 nm in 18 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 75 kt 73 kt min to max 79 kt |
75 | 79 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 13.8 ° 5.9 ° min to max 18.8 ° |
5.9 | 12.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.02 g 0.96 g min to max 1.10 g |
1.05 | 1.08 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 772 fpm 543 fpm min to max 1,026 fpm |
756 | 686 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 558 ft agl 429 ft agl min to max 660 ft agl |
429 | 660 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 7.3 ° 5.3 ° min to max 9.3 ° |
8.0 | 6.7 ° |
Left hand pattern crosswind from runway 28 N94 Carlisle. Distance was less than 1 nm in 25 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Heading 4.9 ° -17.1 ° min to max 15.4 ° |
15.4 | -17.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 75 kt 71 kt min to max 79 kt |
79 | 79 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.93 g min to max 1.07 g |
1.05 | 1.03 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 865 fpm 601 fpm min to max 1,224 fpm |
770 | 691 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 889 ft agl 674 ft agl min to max 1,055 ft agl |
674 | 1,055 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 6.4 ° 0.0 ° min to max 21.5 ° |
10.5 | 21.5 ° | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 7.4 ° 4.9 ° min to max 10.0 ° |
7.2 | 5.9 ° |
Pattern Downwind Turn. Distance was 1 nm. Angle to runway (45 degrees) 62.3 °.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 50.61 % |
Angle to runway (45 degrees) 62.3 °. |
|||
| 100 % |
Average speed 91 kt 79 kt min to max 107 kt |
79 | 107 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 13.1 ° 2.7 ° min to max 22.9 ° |
22.3 | 3.6 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.86 g min to max 1.16 g |
0.91 | 1.01 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -155 fpm -919 fpm min to max 636 fpm |
636 | -585 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 1,064 ft agl 998 ft agl min to max 1,095 ft agl |
1,065 | 998 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 0.2 ° -4.9 ° min to max 5.3 ° |
4.4 | -2.5 ° |
Pattern Downwind Leg. Distance was 2 nm in 79 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 24.08 % |
Heading 16.4 ° 13.7 ° min to max 19.3 ° |
19.0 | 19.3 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average altitude 995 ft agl 911 ft agl min to max 1,054 ft agl |
980 | 1,001 ft agl | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 92 kt 72 kt min to max 116 kt |
109 | 74 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.76 g min to max 1.46 g |
1.06 | 1.00 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 2 fpm -552 fpm min to max 536 fpm |
-552 | -242 fpm | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 1.2 ° 0.0 ° min to max 3.7 ° |
1.4 | 0.7 ° | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 0.5 ° -3.5 ° min to max 4.7 ° |
-2.6 | -0.8 ° |
Pattern Base Leg Turn. Distance was 2 nm. Angle to runway (45 degrees) 50.2 °.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 99.26 % |
Angle to runway (45 degrees) 50.2 °. |
|||
| 100 % |
Average speed 65 kt 58 kt min to max 75 kt |
75 | 60 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 12.2 ° 0.2 ° min to max 18.7 ° |
0.2 | 6.3 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.02 g 0.96 g min to max 1.13 g |
1.00 | 1.02 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -219 fpm -551 fpm min to max 206 fpm |
-240 | -488 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 966 ft agl 896 ft agl min to max 997 ft agl |
997 | 896 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 0.5 ° -3.0 ° min to max 4.4 ° |
-0.6 | -1.6 ° | |
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 11:02:23 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 11:02:28 |
Pattern Base Leg. Distance was 1 nm in 62 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Heading 3.2 ° -14.2 ° min to max 13.5 ° |
13.5 | -14.2 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 60 kt 59 kt min to max 62 kt |
60 | 59 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.87 g min to max 1.07 g |
0.96 | 0.99 g | |
| 0 % | 0 | 0 fpm | ||
| Info |
Average altitude 814 ft agl 776 ft agl min to max 888 ft agl |
888 | 830 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 2.2 ° 0.1 ° min to max 10.9 ° |
4.0 | 10.9 ° | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.1 ° -2.4 ° min to max 4.3 ° |
-2.4 | 2.2 ° |
Pattern Final Turn. Distance was less than 1 nm in 38 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 64 kt 59 kt min to max 68 kt |
59 | 65 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 5.7 ° 0.6 ° min to max 17.1 ° |
11.5 | 0.9 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.88 g min to max 1.16 g |
1.00 | 1.01 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -395 fpm -801 fpm min to max 90 fpm |
90 | -506 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 734 ft agl 565 ft agl min to max 832 ft agl |
831 | 565 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -2.5 ° -6.7 ° min to max 2.0 ° |
2.0 | -2.7 ° | |
| Info |
Flaps Position 3 at 11:04:06 |
Approaching runway 28 at N94 Carlisle from 2 nm to 1 nm. Descent from 559 ft agl to 463 ft agl. A decrease of 95 ft in 7 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 71.01 % |
Approach angle 4.4 ° 4.3 ° min to max 4.5 ° Target 3.0 ° |
4.5 | 4.3 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 65 kt 64 kt min to max 65 kt |
64 | 64 kt | |
| 100 % |
Heading variation 1.8 ° 1.5 ° min to max 2.0 ° |
2.0 | 1.5 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 1.9 ° 1.0 ° min to max 2.6 ° |
2.0 | 1.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 0.98 g 0.80 g min to max 1.07 g |
1.07 | 1.04 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -651 fpm -875 fpm min to max -406 fpm |
-406 | -595 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 513 ft agl 463 ft agl min to max 559 ft agl |
559 | 463 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -4.2 ° -6.5 ° min to max -1.3 ° |
-1.3 | -2.7 ° |
Approaching runway 28 at N94 Carlisle from 1 nm to 0 nm. Descent from 454 ft agl to 6 ft agl. A decrease of 448 ft in 47 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 0 % |
Approach angle 2.1 ° 0.4 ° min to max 4.3 ° Target 3.0 ° |
4.3 | 0.4 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 58 kt 51 kt min to max 64 kt |
64 | 51 kt | |
| 74.8 % |
Heading variation 0.5 ° 0.2 ° min to max 1.1 ° |
1.1 | 0.2 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 1.1 ° 0.0 ° min to max 2.6 ° |
0.7 | 1.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.02 g 0.91 g min to max 1.12 g |
0.99 | 1.09 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -639 fpm -838 fpm min to max -169 fpm |
-562 | -169 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 95 ft agl 6 ft agl min to max 454 ft agl |
454 | 6 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -3.2 ° -6.0 ° min to max 3.0 ° |
-3.0 | 2.8 ° |
Landing on runway 28 at N94 Carlisle, runway length 1,177 m. Good threshold height. Threshold speed was a little below target at 51 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Threshold speed was a little below target at 51 kt. Target 58 kt |
|||
| 100 % |
Target 50 ft agl |
|||
| 97.67 % |
Landing and flare profile |
|||
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.2 ° 0.2 ° min to max 0.2 ° |
0.2 | 0.2 ° | |
| 99.22 % |
Average bank angle 1.3 ° 0.0 ° min to max 2.3 ° |
1.1 | 2.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.97 g min to max 1.07 g |
1.07 | 0.98 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 45 kt 41 kt min to max 51 kt |
51 | 41 kt | |
| Info |
Average VSI -51 fpm -157 fpm min to max -1 fpm |
-157 | -14 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 5 ft agl 4 ft agl min to max 6 ft agl |
6 | 4 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 3.6 ° 2.5 ° min to max 4.5 ° |
2.7 | 4.2 ° |
Touchdown distance was good at 126 m. Touchdown speed at 41 kt was good. Touchdown rate was perfect at -14 fpm. Runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.7 m from centreline. Local weather - Temperature 15 °C. Wind 1 kt at 270 °. Crosswind: 0 kt Headwind: 1 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Touchdown VSI was -14 fpm. |
|||
| 100 % |
Touchdown distance was 126 m Target 457 m |
|||
| 100 % |
Speed at touchdown 41 kt Target below 42 kt |
|||
| 97.63 % |
Runway alignment max 3.70 m 3.49 m left |
3.70 | 3.28 m | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 1.2 ° 0.4 ° min to max 2.0 ° |
2.0 | 0.4 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.02 g 0.98 g min to max 1.04 g |
0.98 | 1.03 g | |
| 100 % |
Landing Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average speed 40 kt 40 kt min to max 41 kt |
41 | 40 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 3.8 ° 3.4 ° min to max 4.2 ° |
4.2 | 3.4 ° |
The Cessna 152 aircraft successfully landed at N94 Carlisle, achieving a score of 91.3%. The final approach was conducted from the east, heading 278.0° at 1 nautical mile and 559 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft was on a steady course for a smooth landing on runway 28, which has a length of 1,177 meters.
The pilot's performance during the landing was commendable, with a good threshold height and a threshold speed that was only slightly below the target of 51 knots. This indicates that the pilot was able to maintain a steady approach speed, which is crucial for a safe landing. The touchdown distance of 126 meters was also within acceptable limits, demonstrating the pilot's ability to control the aircraft's descent and speed.
The touchdown speed of 41 knots was also good, indicating that the pilot was able to bring the aircraft down to a safe speed without overshooting or undershooting the runway. The touchdown rate of -14 feet per minute (fpm) was perfect, suggesting that the pilot was able to control the aircraft's descent and avoid any sudden drops or bounces.
However, there was a slight misalignment of the runway touchdown position, with the aircraft touching down 3.7 meters off the centerline. This may be due to a slight deviation in the pilot's heading or a minor error in navigation. Nevertheless, this minor deviation did not affect the overall safety of the landing.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 15°C and a wind speed of 1 knot from 270°. This resulted in a negligible crosswind and a slight headwind of 1 knot, which did not pose any significant challenges to the pilot. Overall, the landing was a success, with the pilot demonstrating good control and navigation skills.
Drag to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values