Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 152 m above the runway. The 305 m gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,395 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 302 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the Airbus A320 taxiing from the parking area to the runway at Stuttgart Airport, taking approximately 5 minutes to cover less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then departed from runway 07, with a takeoff distance of 1,142 meters, which accounted for 38% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 151 knots.
As the aircraft climbed, it started at an altitude of 674 meters above sea level, 1 mile west of Neuhausen auf den Fildern in Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. The climb continued for 9 minutes, covering 36 nautical miles, and reaching an altitude of 6,707 meters above sea level, an increase of 6,032.5 meters. The aircraft then entered a level cruise, flying overhead Neckarbischofsheim in Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany, for 8 minutes, covering 61 nautical miles.
The enroute descent started overhead Florstadt in Hessen, Germany, where the aircraft descended from 6,708 meters above sea level to 1,216 meters above sea level, a decrease of 5,491.9 meters in 23 minutes, covering 98 nautical miles. The aircraft then entered another level cruise, flying 3 miles northeast of Grevenbroich in Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, for 2 minutes, covering 5 nautical miles. The final descent started overhead Juchen in Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, where the aircraft descended from 1,231 meters above sea level to 414 meters above sea level, a decrease of 816.9 meters in 5 minutes, covering 10 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 05R at Düsseldorf Airport was made from the southwest, heading 53.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 372 meters above ground level. The landing was successful, with a touchdown distance of 303 meters and a touchdown speed of 117 knots, which were both good. However, the touchdown rate was hard at -2.1 meters per second, and the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 7.3 meters from the centerline.
The local weather at the time of landing was 9 degrees Celsius. The total landing distance was 1,129 meters, accounting for 47% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was also misaligned by 16.2 meters from the centerline. After landing, the aircraft taxiied to the parking area, taking approximately 6 minutes to cover less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 217 nautical miles, taking 58 minutes, and the aircraft used 2,295 kilograms of fuel.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed on runway 05R at EDDL Düsseldorf Airport, achieving a score of 89.5%. The aircraft approached the runway from the southwest, heading 53.0° at an altitude of 372.0 meters above ground level (agl) and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on the runway with a speed of 117 knots, which was within the acceptable range. The touchdown distance of 303 meters was also considered good. However, the touchdown rate was slightly hard at -2.1 meters per second, indicating a slightly abrupt touchdown.
The aircraft's alignment with the runway centerline was not perfect, with a deviation of 7.3 meters from the centerline at touchdown. This could be attributed to a slight misalignment during the final approach or during the landing roll. The runway rollout alignment was also misaligned by 16.2 meters from the centerline, which could be a result of the initial misalignment or a slight drift during the landing roll.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 9°C, which did not seem to have any significant impact on the landing performance of the aircraft. The total landing distance of 1,129 meters was 47% of the runway length, which is within the acceptable range. Overall, the landing was considered good, but with some room for improvement in terms of alignment and touchdown rate.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values