Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,449 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,449 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 614 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, achieving a landing score of 71.0% is a good start, but there are definitely areas for improvement in each phase of the landing process.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it's important to ensure a better descent path to stay within the glideslope limit next time. Additionally, paying closer attention to maintaining the target speed will help improve overall performance during this phase.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it's clear that there were significant issues with both the threshold height and landing flare. These are crucial aspects of a successful landing, so focusing on improving these areas will lead to better outcomes in future landings. Additionally, maintaining a proper landing heading is essential for a smooth and controlled landing.
In the Touchdown Phase, it's great to see that the touchdown rate was fair and the speed was on target. However, overshooting the touchdown point by 141 m and being 10.3 m off the centreline suggests room for improvement in terms of precision and alignment during this phase.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, ensuring better runway alignment is key to a successful landing. Being 9.5 m off the centreline indicates a need for increased attention to detail during the rollout process.
Overall, while there are certainly areas that need improvement, achieving a landing score of 71.0% shows potential for growth and development in your landing skills. By focusing on the specific areas outlined above and practicing with intentionality and attention to detail, you can work towards achieving even higher scores in future landings. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in all aspects of your aircraft landings.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values