Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the glidepath
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 14 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: seven checks where the approach path is 300 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out. These checks are the approach's score.
At the 300 ft gate: glideslope 7.9° against the runway's 3° and centreline 4.2° off, against a 1° limit.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 4,996 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the full 4,996 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 857 ft touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The 1.79 G arrival is the firm side of smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from O22 Columbia, the Cessna 208B initiated its departure roll on runway 35, accelerating to a liftoff speed of 90 kt in 2,145 ft, which represented 58% of the available runway length. The aircraft lifted off into a local weather environment characterized by a temperature of 61 °F, a wind of 5 kt at 50 °, with a crosswind of 3 kt and a headwind of 4 kt.
As the aircraft transitioned into the enroute phase, it began its initial climb 1 mile north of Columbia, ascending from 3,427 ft asl to 4,696 ft asl in 2 minutes, covering 7 nm. This was followed by a level cruise phase, which started 1 mile south of Angels Camp and lasted 18 minutes, covering 54 nm. The aircraft then initiated its first descent phase, starting 1 mile south east of Bethel Island, and descended from 4,563 ft asl to 1,909 ft asl in 5 minutes, covering 11 nm. This pattern of climb and descent continued, with the aircraft climbing from 1,906 ft asl to 2,699 ft asl in 2 minutes, covering 4 nm, before descending from 2,697 ft asl to 446 ft asl in 4 minutes, covering 7 nm.
As the aircraft approached its destination, KCCR Buchanan Field, it initiated its final approach to runway 01L from the south west, maintaining a heading of 27.0 ° at 0 nm and 389 ft agl. The aircraft landed on the 4,397 ft runway, with a touchdown distance of 793 ft, which was 47% of the available runway length. The touchdown speed of 73 kt was slightly above the target, while the touchdown rate of -736 fpm was heavy. The aircraft taxied to the parking area in 1 minute, covering less than 1 nm, and completed the flight with a total distance of 85 nm, using -209 lbs of fuel.
The Cessna 208B touched down on runway 01L at KCCR Buchanan Field, with a final approach from the southwest. The aircraft's approach quality was satisfactory, with a heading of 27.0° at 0 nm and 389 ft above ground level. However, the threshold height was significantly above target at 89 ft agl, indicating a slightly high approach. The threshold speed of 79 kt was also well above the target, suggesting a slightly aggressive approach.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's performance was notable. The touchdown distance of 793 ft was good, but the touchdown speed of 73 kt was fast, indicating a potential for a longer rollout. The touchdown rate of -736 fpm was very heavy, which may have contributed to the fast touchdown speed. Fortunately, the runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating a high degree of control and precision during the landing. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 60°F and a light headwind of 2 kt, were favorable for the landing.
The aircraft's rollout was smooth and controlled, with perfect alignment on the runway centerline. The total landing distance of 2,052 ft was 47% of the runway length, which is within acceptable limits. Overall, the landing performance of the Cessna 208B was satisfactory, with a score of 82.5%. While there were some areas for improvement, such as the high approach speed and heavy touchdown rate, the pilot's control and precision during the landing were commendable.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values