Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Ease the nose up sooner to lift off at 151 kt instead of letting speed build on the ground.
What happened: The aircraft lifted off at 167 kt, 16 kt above the target liftoff speed.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator: 151 kt at liftoff
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Fly the flare as one continuous check of the sink rate from 14 ft, holding back pressure steadily rather than adjusting pitch piecemeal.
What happened: The flare drifted away from its intended profile rather than tracking it smoothly from 14 ft down to touchdown.
Watch for: Watch radio altitude and VSI through the flare, aiming to arrest the sink smoothly from 14 ft to touchdown.
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 22 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,692 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 790 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 6 minutes and covered a distance of 4 nautical miles. The aircraft, a Boeing 777-200ER, then departed from runway 27 at San Diego International Airport (KSAN). The takeoff distance was 1,288 meters, which accounted for 61% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 167 knots.
As the aircraft climbed out of San Diego, it encountered local weather conditions of 22°C temperature and a 2-knot headwind at 209°. The enroute climb started 1 mile west of KSAN and reached an altitude of 34,995 feet above sea level (asl) after an increase of 33,990 feet in 23 minutes, covering a distance of 143 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered a level cruise phase, which started 6 miles southeast of Laguna Army Airfield Yuma Proving Ground (KLGF) in Arizona. This phase lasted 44 minutes and covered 372 nautical miles. The aircraft continued to climb and level off at various points, including 18 miles west of Alexander Mun Belen (E80) in New Mexico, where it climbed from 35,009 feet asl to 36,992 feet asl in 3 minutes, covering 30 nautical miles.
The level cruise phase resumed at various points, including 1 mile east of Monterey Park Airport (KMOE) in New Mexico, where it lasted 222 minutes and covered 1,970 nautical miles. The aircraft continued to climb and level off at various points, including 23 miles southwest of Murdochville (Quebec, Canada), where it climbed from 37,003 feet asl to 39,004 feet asl in 3 minutes, covering 32 nautical miles.
The level cruise phase continued until the aircraft entered a descent phase, which started 4 miles northwest of Sainte-Honorine-des-Pertes (Normandie, France). The descent from 38,988 feet asl to 1,634 feet asl took 25 minutes, covering 131 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 09L at Charles de Gaulle International Airport (LFPG) was made from the west, heading 85.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,279 feet above ground level (agl). The landing on runway 09L was successful, with a touchdown point 372 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was 125 knots, and the touchdown rate was smooth at -129 feet per minute (fpm).
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 9°C temperature and a 6-knot crosswind at 160°. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.6 meters from the centerline. The total landing distance was 1,159 meters, which accounted for 43% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was very good.
The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 2 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 5,134 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 610 minutes. The aircraft used 69,169 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 777-200ER aircraft successfully landed at LFPG Charles de Gaulle International Airport, with a score of 88.0%. The final approach to runway 09L was initiated from the west, heading 85.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,279 feet above ground level (agl).
The aircraft's approach to the runway was characterized by a threshold height that was well above the target, indicating a safe margin for landing. The threshold speed was also good, reaching 132 knots, which is an optimal speed for landing. The touchdown point was 372 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which is a relatively long distance but still within acceptable limits.
The touchdown speed of 125 knots was also good, indicating that the aircraft was able to maintain a stable and controlled descent. The touchdown rate was smooth, with a rate of -129 feet per minute (fpm), which is a desirable rate for a safe and controlled landing.
However, there was a slight misalignment of the runway touchdown position, with the aircraft being 3.6 meters off-centerline. This is a minor issue, but it may require some adjustments to the aircraft's approach and landing procedures.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were relatively calm, with a temperature of 9°C and a wind speed of 6 knots from 160°. The crosswind component was 6 knots, while the headwind component was 2 knots. These conditions were favorable for landing, and the aircraft was able to maintain a stable and controlled approach.
The total landing distance was 1,159 meters, which is 43% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the aircraft was able to maintain a stable and controlled descent. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft was able to maintain a stable and controlled roll-out after touchdown.
Overall, the landing was successful, with a score of 88.0%. While there were some minor issues with the touchdown position and landing distance, the aircraft was able to maintain a stable and controlled approach and landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values