Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Raise the gear lever promptly once a positive climb is confirmed, before reaching the target retraction height.
What happened: Gear retraction was delayed, with the gear not coming up until 0 m.
Watch for: Landing gear: up by the normal retraction gate
Arrival
Add power earlier on final to hold VREF of 139 kt by the gates rather than let speed decay.
What happened: The approach was flown too slow through the stabilisation gates, crossing the threshold at 132 kt against a VREF of 139 kt.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator against 139 kt from the first stabilisation gate onward.
See Arrival Approach
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 23 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 305 m and 152 m above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 305 m gate: wings 12° of bank, against a 10° limit and speed 8 kt SLOW on the reference speed of 139 kt.
At the 152 m gate: centreline 1.2° off, against a 1° limit and speed 7 kt SLOW on the reference speed of 139 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,589 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,589 m of the 2,642 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 406 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The 1.70 G arrival is the firm side of smooth.
The rest of the report
Aircraft departed from Rome–Fiumicino Leonardo da Vinci International Airport, taxiing from the parking to the runway took approximately 6 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The departure roll commenced on runway 25, with a takeoff distance of 1,524 meters, accounting for 53% of the runway. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 158 knots, with a local temperature of 21°C and a wind of 5 knots at 280°.
As the aircraft climbed to 9,755 meters above sea level, it covered a distance of 95 nautical miles in 16 minutes, increasing its altitude by 9,447 meters. The enroute climb phase concluded overhead LIRF Rome–Fiumicino Leonardo da Vinci International Airport. The aircraft then entered a series of level cruises and descents, navigating through various waypoints, including Capoliveri, Marina di Campo, Marciana, Macinaggio, San Lorenzo al Mare, and Antibes. The final descent phase began 4 miles south east of Antibes, with the aircraft descending from 802 meters above sea level to 234 meters above sea level in 3 minutes, covering a distance of 6 nautical miles.
The aircraft then commenced its final approach to runway 04L at Nice-Côte d'Azur Airport, touching down at a speed of 128 knots and a distance of 409 meters. The touchdown rate was firm at -1.8 meters per second, and the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.7 meters from the centreline. The total landing distance was 1,508 meters, accounting for 59% of the runway. Following a smooth rollout, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, covering less than 1 nautical mile in 4 minutes. The total flight distance was 286 nautical miles, with a flight time of 67 minutes and a fuel consumption of 2,565 kilograms.
The final approach to runway 04L at LFMN Nice-Côte d'Azur Airport was executed from the south west, with a heading of 48.0° at 3 nm and 228.0 m above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a good threshold height and a threshold speed of 132 kt, which was within the acceptable range. The aircraft maintained a steady descent, touching down at a speed of 128 kt, which was also within the desired parameters.
The touchdown characteristics were firm, with a rate of -1.8 m/s, indicating a controlled and stable landing. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.7 m from the centreline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the approach path. The touchdown distance of 409 m was good, and the total landing distance of 1,508 m, which accounted for 59% of the runway length, was also within the acceptable range.
The runway rollout alignment was very good, with the aircraft maintaining a stable and consistent path along the centreline. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 21 °C and a wind speed of 4 kt at 124°, contributed to a relatively smooth and stable landing. Overall, the landing was scored 96.9%, indicating a high level of proficiency and control.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values