Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 5.1 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Keep easing the back pressure to let the aircraft settle from 24 ft instead of holding it level.
What happened: The sink was arrested at 24 ft and held there instead of being let down.
Watch for: Radio altimeter: continuous descent through the normal flare band to touchdown
See Arrival Landing
Ground effect becomes significant below about one wingspan of height. A Cessna 172, with a 36 ft span, enters ground effect at flare height - the float it feels in the hold-off is ground effect arriving on cue. An A320, with a span around 117 ft, has been in ground effect since before the threshold and there is no sudden cushion to feel, only a gradual reduction in induced drag that lengthens any float you allow.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 26 stages, 25 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,795 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 225 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the departure roll from runway 24 at Edinburgh Airport, where the Airbus A321 took off with a takeoff distance of 1,287 meters, which is 60% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 170 knots. The local weather conditions at the time of departure were a temperature of 19 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 32 knots at 252 degrees, resulting in a crosswind of 8 knots and a headwind of 32 knots.
As the aircraft climbed, it started its enroute climb overhead Newbridge, Scotland, rising from 1,118 feet above sea level to 18,630 feet above sea level, an increase of 17,512 feet in just 8 minutes, covering a distance of 28 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise then began overhead Scone, Scotland, lasting for 3 minutes and covering 22 nautical miles. The aircraft then started another enroute climb 5 miles north west of Kirriemuir, Scotland, rising from 18,596 feet above sea level to 35,227 feet above sea level, an increase of 16,632 feet in 14 minutes, covering a distance of 103 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise then started 21 miles south west of Halkirk, Scotland, lasting for 18 minutes and covering 136 nautical miles. As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its enroute descent 60 miles south east of Sumba, Faroe Islands, descending from 34,981 feet above sea level to 4,196 feet above sea level, a decrease of 30,786 feet in 20 minutes, covering a distance of 91 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise then started 2 miles north east of Skopun, Faroe Islands, lasting for 2 minutes and covering 4 nautical miles.
The aircraft then began its final descent 5 miles north west of Skopun, Faroe Islands, descending from 3,783 feet above sea level to 1,725 feet above sea level, a decrease of 2,058 feet in 3 minutes, covering a distance of 6 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 30 at Vágar Airport was from the south east, heading 298.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,463 feet above ground level.
However, the aircraft performed a go-around at 26 feet above ground level, before landing on runway 30 at Vágar Airport. The runway length was 1,795 meters, and the threshold height was good. The threshold speed was well above the target at 145 knots. The touchdown distance was good at 226 meters, but the touchdown speed was a little fast at 138 knots. The touchdown rate was firm at -368 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was very good.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of 13 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 23 knots at 315 degrees, resulting in a crosswind of 7 knots and a headwind of 22 knots. The total landing distance was 1,012 meters, which is 56% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was also very good. After landing, the aircraft took 4 minutes to taxi to the parking area from the runway, covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 403 nautical miles, taking 96 minutes, and the aircraft used 4,826 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A321 successfully landed at EKVG Vágar Airport, achieving a high score of 96.9%. The aircraft approached the runway from the south east, heading 298.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,463 feet above ground level (agl). The pilot maintained a good threshold height, which is a crucial aspect of a safe landing.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's threshold speed was slightly above the target speed of 142 knots, registering at 145 kt. This indicates that the pilot may have been slightly aggressive in their approach, but still managed to maintain control of the aircraft. The touchdown distance was good, measuring 226 meters, which is within the acceptable range for a runway of 1,795 meters in length.
However, the touchdown speed of 138 kt was a little fast, which may have resulted in a firm touchdown rate of -368 feet per minute (fpm). A firm touchdown rate can be a concern, as it may indicate that the aircraft is touching down with too much force, which can lead to damage or discomfort for passengers. Nevertheless, the runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating that the pilot maintained a stable and controlled approach.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were moderate, with a temperature of 13°C and a wind speed of 23 kt from 315°. The crosswind component was relatively low at 7 kt, while the headwind component was 22 kt, which helped to reduce the aircraft's ground speed and make the landing more manageable.
The total landing distance was 1,012 meters, which is 56% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the pilot was able to maintain a high level of control and precision throughout the approach and landing phases. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, indicating that the pilot was able to maintain a stable and controlled rollout after touchdown.
Overall, the landing was successful, and the pilot demonstrated a high level of skill and precision in navigating the aircraft to a safe and controlled touchdown.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values