Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 23 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,710 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,710 m of the 2,997 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 454 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Firstly, it's important to acknowledge the areas that need improvement in the aircraft landing score of 82.5%. While the overall score is decent, there are specific phases of the landing process that could be enhanced to achieve a higher rating.
The Approach Phase appears to be the weakest link in the landing performance, with the descent path exceeding the glideslope limit. This can be addressed by ensuring better adherence to the designated glide path during descent, which will ultimately lead to a smoother and more controlled approach.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, the threshold height being significantly above the target is a crucial factor to focus on. Keeping the threshold height in line with the intended target will contribute to a more precise and controlled landing. Additionally, improving the landing flare technique will result in a smoother touchdown and overall landing experience.
In the Touchdown Phase, it is notable that the touchdown rate was very hard. This can potentially be harmful to the aircraft and its passengers, so it's crucial to work on achieving a softer touchdown. On the positive side, the speed was on target, and the touchdown distance within the designated zone. It's important to maintain these aspects while also working on achieving a gentler touchdown.
Lastly, the Rollout Phase shows a runway alignment that is slightly off-center. By focusing on maintaining a more precise runway alignment, the overall landing score can be significantly improved.
Despite these areas for improvement, it's important to commend the aspects that were executed well, such as the speed being on target and the touchdown distance falling within the designated zone. This demonstrates potential for improvement and growth in the landing performance.
By addressing the weak points in the landing process and building on the strengths, there is great potential for a higher landing score in the future. With dedication, practice, and attention to detail, the aircraft landing performance can be enhanced to achieve even greater success in the future. Keep up the hard work and determination towards improvement!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values